EMEQ vs. MEMX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX).

EMEQ and MEMX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMEQ is an actively managed fund by Nomura. It was launched on Sep 4, 2024. MEMX is an actively managed fund by Matthews. It was launched on Jan 10, 2023.

Performance

EMEQ vs. MEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EMEQ vs. MEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	14.16%	69.78%	-1.16%
MEMX Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF	7.64%	35.88%	-3.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEQ achieves a 14.16% return, which is significantly higher than MEMX's 7.64% return.

EMEQ

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -10.65%
• YTD: 14.16%
• 6M: 30.81%
• 1Y: 82.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MEMX

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: -7.96%
• YTD: 7.64%
• 6M: 20.48%
• 1Y: 51.16%
• 3Y*: 19.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEQ vs. MEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than MEMX's 0.79% expense ratio.

EMEQ

Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Return for Risk

EMEQ vs. MEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 96
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 96

MEMX

MEMX Risk / Return Rank: 94
MEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
MEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
MEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
MEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEQ vs. MEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMEQ	MEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	2.52	+0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	3.19	+0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.47	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.68	3.50	+1.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.73	14.46	+4.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMEQ vs. MEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the MEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMEQ and MEMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMEQ	MEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78	2.52	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.88	1.13	+0.75

Correlation

The correlation between EMEQ and MEMX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EMEQ vs. MEMX - Dividend Comparison

EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than MEMX's 4.54% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.42%	2.76%	0.84%	0.00%
MEMX Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF	4.54%	4.88%	0.99%	1.13%

Drawdowns

EMEQ vs. MEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, roughly equal to the maximum MEMX drawdown of -19.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and MEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMEQ	MEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.99%	-19.27%	-0.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.91%	-14.70%	-3.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.88%	-10.31%	-2.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.09%	-3.54%	-0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.47%	3.56%	+0.91%

Volatility

EMEQ vs. MEMX - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a higher volatility of 15.38% compared to Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) at 10.72%. This indicates that EMEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMEQ	MEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.38%	10.72%	+4.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.91%	16.25%	+7.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.87%	20.41%	+9.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.51%	16.07%	+11.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.51%	16.07%	+11.44%