EMEQ vs. IDV

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMEQ is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Nomura, while IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. EMEQ is actively managed, while IDV is passively managed. Over the past year, EMEQ returned 153.11% vs 35.47% for IDV. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMEQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for IDV.

Performance

EMEQ vs. IDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEQ achieves a 78.37% return, which is significantly higher than IDV's 12.82% return.

EMEQ

• 1D: 4.84%
• 1M: 15.54%
• YTD: 78.37%
• 6M: 90.73%
• 1Y: 153.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IDV

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 12.82%
• 6M: 14.44%
• 1Y: 35.47%
• 3Y*: 24.42%
• 5Y*: 12.20%
• 10Y*: 10.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEQ vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	78.37%	69.78%	-0.73%
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF	12.82%	52.16%	-4.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EMEQ and IDV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	0.54

The correlation between EMEQ and IDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMEQ vs. IDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMEQ	IDV
Financial Services	6.8%	30.6%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	7.2%
Communication Services	2.4%	9.9%
Healthcare	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.3%	6.3%
Energy	1.3%	14.8%
Technology	1.1%	0.9%
Utilities	0.9%	11.5%
Industrials	0.3%	6.9%
Real Estate	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

EMEQ vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 96
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 96

IDV

IDV Risk / Return Rank: 87
IDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
IDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
IDV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
IDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
IDV Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEQ vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMEQ	IDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.32	2.73	+1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.33	3.57	+0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	1.50	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.60	4.18	+4.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	32.09	15.48	+16.62

EMEQ vs. IDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMEQ Sharpe Ratio is 4.32, which is higher than the IDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMEQ and IDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMEQ vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, smaller than the maximum IDV drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and IDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMEQ	IDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.99%	-70.14%	+50.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.91%	-8.52%	-9.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.86%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-2.37%	+1.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.04%	-15.38%	+11.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	2.30%	+2.49%

Volatility

EMEQ vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a higher volatility of 19.86% compared to iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) at 4.28%. This indicates that EMEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMEQ	IDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.86%	4.28%	+15.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.72%	10.90%	+21.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.77%	13.07%	+22.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.02%	15.59%	+16.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.02%	17.93%	+14.09%

EMEQ vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMEQ vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison

EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than IDV's 7.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.55%	2.76%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF	7.09%	4.94%	6.46%	6.51%	7.33%	5.78%	5.47%	5.15%	5.93%	4.52%	4.69%	5.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMEQ and IDV in my portfolio?

EMEQ and IDV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMEQ or IDV?

EMEQ has higher volatility (19.86%) compared to IDV (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMEQ dropped -19.99% vs IDV's -70.14%.

Which ETF is better, EMEQ or IDV?

On 1-year performance, EMEQ leads with 153.11% vs 35.47% for IDV. On fees, IDV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, IDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMEQ or IDV?

Over the 1-year period, EMEQ has performed better with a 153.11% return vs 35.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMEQ or IDV?

IDV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMEQ or IDV?

IDV has the higher dividend yield at 7.09%, compared with 1.55% for EMEQ.

What is the main difference between EMEQ and IDV?

EMEQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while IDV is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Nomura and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMEQ and 0.49% for IDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.