EMEQ vs. IDEQ
EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and IDEQ (Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMEQ is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Nomura, while IDEQ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Lazard. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMEQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IDEQ.
Performance
EMEQ vs. IDEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMEQ achieves a 59.67% return, which is significantly higher than IDEQ's 13.67% return.
EMEQ
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- 59.67%
- 6M
- 66.91%
- 1Y
- 129.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDEQ
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 13.67%
- 6M
- 17.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMEQ vs. IDEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 59.67% | 31.81% |
IDEQ Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF | 13.67% | 11.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMEQ and IDEQ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMEQ vs. IDEQ — Risk / Return Rank
EMEQ
IDEQ
EMEQ vs. IDEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMEQ | IDEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMEQ | IDEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.43 | 1.94 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
EMEQ vs. IDEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, which is greater than IDEQ's maximum drawdown of -12.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and IDEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMEQ | IDEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.99% | -12.95% | -7.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.49% | -3.42% | -8.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -2.11% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | — | — |
Volatility
EMEQ vs. IDEQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMEQ | IDEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.42% | 18.93% | +15.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.30% | 18.93% | +12.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.30% | 18.93% | +12.37% |
EMEQ vs. IDEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMEQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEQ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMEQ vs. IDEQ - Dividend Comparison
EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than IDEQ's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.73% | 2.76% | 0.84% |
IDEQ Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF | 0.53% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMEQ and IDEQ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDEQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDEQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.
EMEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.53% for IDEQ.
EMEQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while IDEQ is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Nomura and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMEQ and 0.40% for IDEQ.
Find the right allocation for EMEQ and IDEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer