PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMEQ vs. DGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMEQ vs. DGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMEQ vs. DGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEQ achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than DGS's 5.34% return.


EMEQ

1D
4.30%
1M
-13.54%
YTD
12.19%
6M
30.58%
1Y
80.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DGS

1D
2.72%
1M
-6.99%
YTD
5.34%
6M
6.67%
1Y
29.07%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMEQ vs. DGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than DGS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMEQ vs. DGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEQ
EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

DGS
DGS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEQ vs. DGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMEQDGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.72

1.76

+0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.21

2.37

+0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.34

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

2.56

+1.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.19

9.49

+8.69

EMEQ vs. DGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the DGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMEQ and DGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMEQDGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

1.76

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.83

0.21

+1.62

Correlation

The correlation between EMEQ and DGS is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EMEQ vs. DGS - Dividend Comparison

EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than DGS's 3.49% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMEQ
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.46%2.76%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.49%3.45%3.36%4.55%5.34%3.98%3.69%3.95%4.24%2.81%3.42%3.28%

Drawdowns

EMEQ vs. DGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, smaller than the maximum DGS drawdown of -61.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and DGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMEQDGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.99%

-61.83%

+41.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.91%

-10.99%

-6.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.38%

-7.62%

-6.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-12.68%

+8.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

2.96%

+1.44%

Volatility

EMEQ vs. DGS - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a higher volatility of 17.37% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) at 8.48%. This indicates that EMEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMEQDGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.37%

8.48%

+8.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.87%

11.46%

+12.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.84%

16.59%

+13.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.51%

14.66%

+12.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.51%

17.25%

+10.26%