EMEH.DE vs. LYTR.DE
EMEH.DE (BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR) and LYTR.DE (Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc) are both Commodities funds - EMEH.DE tracks the BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged) while LYTR.DE tracks the Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMEH.DE returned 11.35%/yr vs 17.81%/yr for LYTR.DE. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMEH.DE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LYTR.DE.
Performance
EMEH.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMEH.DE achieves a 21.33% return, which is significantly lower than LYTR.DE's 31.68% return.
EMEH.DE
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 21.33%
- 6M
- 22.74%
- 1Y
- 43.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
LYTR.DE
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 31.68%
- 6M
- 37.89%
- 1Y
- 63.68%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
EMEH.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMEH.DE BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR | 21.33% | 25.40% | 6.63% | -12.26% | 11.15% | 27.11% | -4.42% | 7.62% | -90.10% | 4.93% |
LYTR.DE Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc | 31.68% | 17.61% | 13.31% | -15.11% | 27.05% | 52.41% | -19.51% | 14.38% | -6.19% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMEH.DE and LYTR.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017 | 0.74 |
The correlation between EMEH.DE and LYTR.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMEH.DE vs. LYTR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMEH.DE
LYTR.DE
EMEH.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) and Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMEH.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.48 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.95 | 5.47 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.34 | 16.93 | -2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMEH.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.83 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.91 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | 0.12 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
EMEH.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMEH.DE drawdown since its inception was -92.42%, which is greater than LYTR.DE's maximum drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEH.DE and LYTR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMEH.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.42% | -67.69% | -24.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -11.84% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.28% | -17.04% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.73% | -30.29% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.34% | -3.72% | -76.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.38% | -31.29% | -50.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 3.83% | -0.75% |
Volatility
EMEH.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) is 4.15%, while Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that EMEH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYTR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMEH.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 5.20% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.95% | 20.33% | -4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 22.94% | -5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 19.40% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.16% | 18.20% | +15.96% |
EMEH.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMEH.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than LYTR.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMEH.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMEH.DE nor LYTR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, EMEH.DE and LYTR.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LYTR.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYTR.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMEH.DE.
EMEH.DE tracks BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged), while LYTR.DE tracks Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMEH.DE and 0.30% for LYTR.DE.
Find the right allocation for EMEH.DE and LYTR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer