EMEC.DE vs. XDEB.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EMEC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR) and XDEB.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - EMEC.DE tracks the ECPI Circular Economy Leaders Equity while XDEB.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMEC.DE returned 9.49%/yr vs 6.21%/yr for XDEB.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMEC.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEB.DE.

Performance

EMEC.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (EMEC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEC.DE achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.DE's 1.74% return.

EMEC.DE

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 5.19%
• YTD: 10.95%
• 6M: 10.54%
• 1Y: 21.09%
• 3Y*: 11.29%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: —

XDEB.DE

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: 1.74%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: -0.08%
• 3Y*: 6.45%
• 5Y*: 6.21%
• 10Y*: 6.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEC.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EMEC.DE BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR	10.95%	5.92%	10.86%	19.48%	-12.91%	37.20%	8.36%	18.47%
XDEB.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C	1.74%	-1.27%	17.83%	3.66%	-4.06%	24.01%	-6.66%	10.68%

Correlation

The correlation between EMEC.DE and XDEB.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between EMEC.DE and XDEB.DE has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

EMEC.DE vs. XDEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEC.DE

EMEC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 52
EMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
EMEC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
EMEC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EMEC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
EMEC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 53

XDEB.DE

XDEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9
XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
XDEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
XDEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8
XDEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
XDEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEC.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (EMEC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMEC.DE	XDEB.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	-0.01	+1.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	0.04	+2.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.00	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	-0.02	+2.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	-0.03	+9.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMEC.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMEC.DE and XDEB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMEC.DE	XDEB.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	-0.01	+1.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.61	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.70	+0.12

Drawdowns

EMEC.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEC.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.18%, which is greater than XDEB.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEC.DE and XDEB.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMEC.DE	XDEB.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.18%	-28.57%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.95%	-5.31%	-2.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.78%	-13.02%	-7.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.78%	-13.02%	-7.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-6.53%	+6.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.05%	-5.03%	-0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	2.37%	-0.05%

Volatility

EMEC.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (EMEC.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that EMEC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMEC.DE	XDEB.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	2.63%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.86%	5.56%	+3.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.15%	7.86%	+4.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.05%	10.16%	+3.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.00%	12.03%	+3.97%

EMEC.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEC.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEB.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMEC.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMEC.DE nor XDEB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMEC.DE and XDEB.DE in my portfolio?

EMEC.DE and XDEB.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMEC.DE or XDEB.DE?

On fees, XDEB.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMEC.DE or XDEB.DE?

XDEB.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EMEC.DE.

What is the main difference between EMEC.DE and XDEB.DE?

EMEC.DE tracks ECPI Circular Economy Leaders Equity, while XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EMEC.DE and 0.25% for XDEB.DE.