PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMDM vs. LITE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMDM vs. LITE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDM achieves a 36.28% return, which is significantly lower than LITE's 150.02% return.


EMDM

1D
0.70%
1M
6.11%
YTD
36.28%
6M
42.03%
1Y
83.08%
3Y*
30.34%
5Y*
10Y*

LITE

1D
3.59%
1M
-5.06%
YTD
150.02%
6M
184.13%
1Y
1,017.52%
3Y*
158.28%
5Y*
62.72%
10Y*
43.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMDM vs. LITE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
36.28%59.68%-4.93%14.75%
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
150.02%339.06%60.15%-1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDM and LITE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2023

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMDM vs. LITE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDM
EMDM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
EMDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

LITE
LITE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
LITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
LITE Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
LITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
LITE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDM vs. LITE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMDMLITEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.71

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.18

34.43

-29.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.59

126.26

-105.67

EMDM vs. LITE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDM Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is lower than the LITE Sharpe Ratio of 11.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDM and LITE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMDM vs. LITE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDM drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, smaller than the maximum LITE drawdown of -66.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDM and LITE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMDMLITEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.81%

-66.89%

+48.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.65%

-28.70%

+13.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-50.63%

+31.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

-12.49%

+9.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-23.57%

+19.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

7.81%

-3.88%

Volatility

EMDM vs. LITE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) is 12.16%, while Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) has a volatility of 28.12%. This indicates that EMDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LITE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMDMLITEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.16%

28.12%

-15.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.86%

69.73%

-46.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.23%

86.47%

-61.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.36%

59.94%

-39.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.36%

56.62%

-36.26%

Dividends

EMDM vs. LITE - Dividend Comparison

EMDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, while LITE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
2.62%3.57%5.87%2.16%
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMDM and LITE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LITE has higher volatility (28.12%) compared to EMDM (12.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDM dropped -18.81% vs LITE's -66.89%.

LITE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.43 vs 3.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMDM and LITE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer