EMDM vs. FTXL
EMDM (First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMDM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMDM returned 33.55%/yr vs 60.35%/yr for FTXL. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMDM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
EMDM vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMDM achieves a 40.89% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 111.04% return.
EMDM
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 12.12%
- YTD
- 40.89%
- 6M
- 47.96%
- 1Y
- 93.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- 5.49%
- 1M
- 26.62%
- YTD
- 111.04%
- 6M
- 112.63%
- 1Y
- 228.34%
- 3Y*
- 60.35%
- 5Y*
- 34.54%
- 10Y*
- —
EMDM vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 40.89% | 59.68% | -4.93% | 14.21% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 111.04% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 32.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMDM and FTXL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023 | 0.64 |
The correlation between EMDM and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMDM vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMDM
FTXL
Technology
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
EMDM
FTXL
Financial Services
EMDM
FTXL
-
Basic Materials
EMDM
FTXL
-
Energy
EMDM
FTXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMDM
FTXL
-
Communication Services
EMDM
FTXL
-
Consumer Defensive
EMDM
FTXL
-
Industrials
EMDM
FTXL
Utilities
EMDM
FTXL
-
Healthcare
EMDM
FTXL
-
Real Estate
EMDM
-
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMDM vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
EMDM
FTXL
EMDM vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMDM | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.02 | 6.40 | -2.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.65 | 5.79 | -1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.79 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.08 | 16.08 | -10.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.25 | 60.11 | -34.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMDM | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02 | 6.40 | -2.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 0.93 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
EMDM vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMDM drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDM and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMDM | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.81% | -43.87% | +25.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.65% | -14.51% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | -41.57% | +22.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -10.56% | +6.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 3.88% | -0.11% |
Volatility
EMDM vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) is 9.47%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.41%. This indicates that EMDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMDM | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.47% | 14.41% | -4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.73% | 28.95% | -8.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.38% | 35.91% | -12.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 36.01% | -16.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 34.25% | -14.47% |
EMDM vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMDM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMDM vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
EMDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than FTXL's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 2.53% | 3.57% | 5.87% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.13% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMDM and FTXL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (14.41%) compared to EMDM (9.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDM dropped -18.81% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 3-year performance, FTXL leads with 60.35% vs 33.55% for EMDM. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, EMDM has been the lower-risk option at 9.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 60.35% return vs 33.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMDM.
EMDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 0.13% for FTXL.
EMDM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while FTXL is Semiconductors. EMDM tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMDM and 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.40 vs 4.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMDM and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer