PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMDM vs. FEMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMDM vs. FEMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMDM vs. FEMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
13.96%59.68%-4.32%
FEMR
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF
6.15%35.27%-1.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDM achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than FEMR's 6.15% return.


EMDM

1D
1.85%
1M
-8.42%
YTD
13.96%
6M
28.51%
1Y
70.27%
3Y*
25.62%
5Y*
10Y*

FEMR

1D
0.92%
1M
-8.31%
YTD
6.15%
6M
10.88%
1Y
36.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMDM vs. FEMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMR's 0.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMDM vs. FEMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDM
EMDM Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EMDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDM Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMR
FEMR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FEMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDM vs. FEMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMDMFEMRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.00

1.76

+1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.61

2.32

+1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.35

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

2.60

+1.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.05

10.22

+8.83

EMDM vs. FEMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDM Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the FEMR Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDM and FEMR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMDMFEMRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

1.76

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

1.49

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between EMDM and FEMR is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EMDM vs. FEMR - Dividend Comparison

EMDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than FEMR's 1.77% yield.


TTM202520242023
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
3.13%3.57%5.87%2.16%
FEMR
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF
1.77%1.92%0.37%0.00%

Drawdowns

EMDM vs. FEMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDM drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, which is greater than FEMR's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDM and FEMR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMDMFEMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.81%

-15.58%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.65%

-14.47%

-1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.78%

-10.16%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-2.35%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

3.68%

+0.08%

Volatility

EMDM vs. FEMR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a higher volatility of 11.92% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) at 10.05%. This indicates that EMDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMDMFEMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.92%

10.05%

+1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.42%

15.74%

+2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.58%

21.02%

+2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

19.86%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.00%

19.86%

-0.86%