PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMDM vs. AIRR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMDM vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDM achieves a 39.03% return, which is significantly higher than AIRR's 31.77% return.


EMDM

1D
-1.32%
1M
11.04%
YTD
39.03%
6M
45.21%
1Y
91.32%
3Y*
32.95%
5Y*
10Y*

AIRR

1D
0.54%
1M
3.36%
YTD
31.77%
6M
31.32%
1Y
65.82%
3Y*
37.10%
5Y*
25.40%
10Y*
21.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMDM vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
39.03%59.68%-4.93%14.21%
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
31.77%27.92%33.45%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDM and AIRR is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023

0.56

The correlation between EMDM and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMDM vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMDM
AIRR

Technology

32.1%
0.5%

Financial Services

27.2%
9.6%

Basic Materials

15.1%

-

Energy

6.3%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%

-

Communication Services

4.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.4%

-

Industrials

3.3%
84.6%

Utilities

1.9%

-

Healthcare

0.5%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

EMDM
32.1%
AIRR
0.5%

Financial Services

EMDM
27.2%
AIRR
9.6%

Basic Materials

EMDM
15.1%
AIRR

-

Energy

EMDM
6.3%
AIRR
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EMDM
6.0%
AIRR

-

Communication Services

EMDM
4.3%
AIRR

-

Consumer Defensive

EMDM
3.4%
AIRR

-

Industrials

EMDM
3.3%
AIRR
84.6%

Utilities

EMDM
1.9%
AIRR

-

Healthcare

EMDM
0.5%
AIRR

-

Real Estate

EMDM

-

AIRR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMDM vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDM
EMDM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
EMDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDM vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMDMAIRRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.92

2.61

+1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.56

3.37

+1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.41

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.87

5.05

+0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.30

18.68

+5.62

EMDM vs. AIRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDM Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is higher than the AIRR Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDM and AIRR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMDMAIRRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92

2.61

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.58

0.67

+0.91

Drawdowns

EMDM vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDM drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDM and AIRR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMDMAIRRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.81%

-42.37%

+23.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.65%

-13.09%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-27.95%

+9.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-1.86%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-7.43%

+3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

3.53%

+0.24%

Volatility

EMDM vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a higher volatility of 9.61% compared to First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) at 7.87%. This indicates that EMDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMDMAIRRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.61%

7.87%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.78%

19.82%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.42%

25.40%

-1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

25.29%

-5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.79%

26.29%

-6.50%

EMDM vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AIRR's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMDM vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

EMDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.13%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
2.57%3.57%5.87%2.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMDM and AIRR have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMDM has higher volatility (9.61%) compared to AIRR (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDM dropped -18.81% vs AIRR's -42.37%.

On 3-year performance, AIRR leads with 37.10% vs 32.95% for EMDM. On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, AIRR has been the lower-risk option at 7.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 37.10% return vs 32.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIRR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMDM.

EMDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.

EMDM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while AIRR is Building & Construction. EMDM tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance (TR). Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMDM and 0.70% for AIRR.

EMDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMDM and AIRR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer