EMDL.L vs. EMSA.L
EMDL.L (SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF) and EMSA.L (iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - EMDL.L tracks the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD while EMSA.L tracks the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMDL.L returned 1.57%/yr vs 2.45%/yr for EMSA.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMDL.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EMSA.L.
Performance
EMDL.L vs. EMSA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMDL.L is traded in GBP, while EMSA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMSA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMDL.L achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than EMSA.L's 2.02% return.
EMDL.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -0.55%
- 1Y
- 5.93%
- 3Y*
- 2.66%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.73%
EMSA.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 11.70%
- 3Y*
- 6.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.45%
- 10Y*
- —
EMDL.L vs. EMSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDL.L SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF | -0.66% | 7.85% | -1.25% | 3.50% | 0.26% | -7.31% | 0.02% | 8.55% | 5.62% |
EMSA.L iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.02% | 5.05% | 7.16% | 4.23% | -9.12% | -2.19% | 2.91% | 11.39% | 2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMDL.L and EMSA.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018 | 0.57 |
The correlation between EMDL.L and EMSA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMDL.L vs. EMSA.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMDL.L
EMSA.L
EMDL.L vs. EMSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (EMDL.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMDL.L | EMSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 2.56 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.34 | 7.33 | -3.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMDL.L | EMSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.69 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.26 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.28 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
EMDL.L vs. EMSA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMDL.L drawdown since its inception was -27.54%, which is greater than EMSA.L's maximum drawdown of -19.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDL.L and EMSA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMDL.L | EMSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.54% | -19.02% | -8.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.91% | -4.56% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.91% | -9.21% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.41% | -15.35% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.44% | -0.27% | -3.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -8.11% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.59% | +0.18% |
Volatility
EMDL.L vs. EMSA.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (EMDL.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L) have volatilities of 2.00% and 2.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMDL.L | EMSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 2.02% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.52% | 5.43% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.45% | 6.91% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.22% | 9.36% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.07% | 10.66% | -1.59% |
EMDL.L vs. EMSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMDL.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EMSA.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMDL.L vs. EMSA.L - Dividend Comparison
EMDL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, while EMSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDL.L SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF | 5.09% | 4.87% | 4.87% | 4.23% | 4.03% | 4.01% | 3.97% | 4.56% | 4.06% | 4.92% | 4.02% | 5.26% |
EMSA.L iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMDL.L and EMSA.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMSA.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMSA.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMDL.L.
EMDL.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while EMSA.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EMDL.L and 0.45% for EMSA.L.
Find the right allocation for EMDL.L and EMSA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer