PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMCS vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMCS vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMCS achieves a 24.75% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 5.44% return.


EMCS

1D
-3.99%
1M
-3.97%
6M
17.62%
YTD
24.75%
1Y
44.48%
3Y*
23.07%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*

UUP

1D
0.39%
1M
1.97%
6M
4.47%
YTD
5.44%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMCS vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMCS
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF
24.75%38.71%10.12%5.68%-23.58%-2.02%19.72%19.54%-1.41%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
5.44%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%5.73%-6.66%4.09%-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between EMCS and UUP is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018

-0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMCS vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMCS
EMCS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EMCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMCS vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMCSUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

2.28

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.68

6.26

+4.42

EMCS vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMCS and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMCS vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMCS drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCS and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMCSUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.86%

-22.19%

-22.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.32%

-3.65%

-10.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.73%

-10.05%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.25%

-10.37%

-29.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.88%

-1.26%

-8.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.45%

-8.88%

-7.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

1.33%

+2.85%

Volatility

EMCS vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) has a higher volatility of 12.31% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.45%. This indicates that EMCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMCSUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.31%

1.45%

+10.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.90%

4.34%

+19.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.27%

6.03%

+20.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

7.22%

+14.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.12%

6.90%

+15.22%

EMCS vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMCS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMCS vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

EMCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than UUP's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMCS
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF
1.52%1.66%0.67%3.07%2.26%1.46%1.40%3.56%0.00%0.00%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.25%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMCS and UUP have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMCS has higher volatility (12.31%) compared to UUP (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCS dropped -44.86% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 5-year performance, EMCS leads with 7.01% vs 5.89% for UUP. On fees, EMCS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EMCS has performed better with a 7.01% return vs 5.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMCS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

UUP has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 1.52% for EMCS.

EMCS is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while UUP is Currency. EMCS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMCS and 0.75% for UUP.

EMCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMCS and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer