EMCS vs. GEME

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EMCS (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF) and GEME (Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. EMCS is passively managed, while GEME is actively managed. Over the past year, EMCS returned 45.63% vs 60.84% for GEME. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EMCS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GEME.

Performance

EMCS vs. GEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) and Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMCS achieves a 24.35% return, which is significantly lower than GEME's 29.70% return.

EMCS

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -0.73%
• 6M: 14.38%
• YTD: 24.35%
• 1Y: 45.63%
• 3Y*: 22.52%
• 5Y*: 8.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.33%

GEME

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -0.95%
• 6M: 16.89%
• YTD: 29.70%
• 1Y: 60.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 46.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF	$164.87K	$2.68M	$967.26K
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	$6.60M	$4.28M	$3.34M

EMCS vs. GEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF	24.35%	35.57%
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	29.70%	37.43%

Correlation

The correlation between EMCS and GEME is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025	0.89

The correlation between EMCS and GEME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EMCS vs. GEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMCS

EMCS Risk / Return Rank: 73
EMCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EMCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
EMCS Omega Ratio Rank: 73
EMCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
EMCS Martin Ratio Rank: 73

GEME

GEME Risk / Return Rank: 90
GEME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
GEME Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GEME Omega Ratio Rank: 90
GEME Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
GEME Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMCS vs. GEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) and Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMCS	GEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	2.46	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	2.99	-0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.42	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	4.41	-1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.14	13.63	-4.49

EMCS vs. GEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the GEME Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMCS and GEME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMCS vs. GEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMCS drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, which is greater than GEME's maximum drawdown of -16.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCS and GEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMCS	GEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.86%	-16.86%	-28.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.25%	-13.46%	-1.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.17%	-7.52%	-2.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.41%	-2.72%	-13.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.87%	4.35%	+0.52%

Volatility

EMCS vs. GEME - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) has a higher volatility of 10.10% compared to Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) at 7.60%. This indicates that EMCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GEME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMCS	GEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.10%	7.60%	+2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.90%	21.41%	+3.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.26%	24.18%	+3.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.68%	24.09%	-2.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.23%	24.09%	-1.86%

EMCS vs. GEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMCS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GEME's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMCS vs. GEME - Dividend Comparison

EMCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than GEME's 5.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF	1.53%	1.66%	0.67%	3.07%	2.26%	1.46%	1.40%	3.56%
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	5.40%	7.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMCS and GEME in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, EMCS and GEME move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EMCS or GEME?

EMCS has higher volatility (10.10%) compared to GEME (7.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCS dropped -44.86% vs GEME's -16.86%.

Which ETF is better, EMCS or GEME?

On 1-year performance, GEME leads with 60.84% vs 45.63% for EMCS. On fees, EMCS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GEME has been the lower-risk option at 7.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMCS or GEME?

Over the 1-year period, GEME has performed better with a 60.84% return vs 45.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMCS or GEME?

EMCS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMCS or GEME?

GEME has the higher dividend yield at 5.40%, compared with 1.53% for EMCS.

What is the main difference between EMCS and GEME?

They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Pacific AM. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMCS and 0.75% for GEME.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GEME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.