PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMCS vs. DEUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMCS vs. DEUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) and Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMCS achieves a 35.45% return, which is significantly higher than DEUS's 10.91% return.


EMCS

1D
1.81%
1M
14.49%
YTD
35.45%
6M
39.15%
1Y
67.22%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*

DEUS

1D
0.73%
1M
2.26%
YTD
10.91%
6M
11.97%
1Y
19.24%
3Y*
16.46%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
11.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMCS vs. DEUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMCS
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF
35.45%38.71%10.12%5.68%-23.58%-2.02%19.72%19.54%-0.59%
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
10.91%10.41%14.33%14.73%-11.18%26.31%8.81%28.80%-7.46%

Correlation

The correlation between EMCS and DEUS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2018

0.58

The correlation between EMCS and DEUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMCS vs. DEUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMCS
DEUS

Technology

44.5%
15.5%

Financial Services

29.4%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
10.6%

Communication Services

8.4%
3.8%

Basic Materials

2.6%
4.5%

Industrials

2.5%
17.6%

Energy

1.6%
5.5%

Real Estate

1.0%
4.3%

Utilities

0.8%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
7.5%

Healthcare

0.0%
11.4%

Technology

EMCS
44.5%
DEUS
15.5%

Financial Services

EMCS
29.4%
DEUS
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EMCS
9.1%
DEUS
10.6%

Communication Services

EMCS
8.4%
DEUS
3.8%

Basic Materials

EMCS
2.6%
DEUS
4.5%

Industrials

EMCS
2.5%
DEUS
17.6%

Energy

EMCS
1.6%
DEUS
5.5%

Real Estate

EMCS
1.0%
DEUS
4.3%

Utilities

EMCS
0.8%
DEUS
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

EMCS
0.0%
DEUS
7.5%

Healthcare

EMCS
0.0%
DEUS
11.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMCS vs. DEUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMCS
EMCS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EMCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCS Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

DEUS
DEUS Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DEUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DEUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMCS vs. DEUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) and Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMCSDEUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.03

1.75

+1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.84

2.59

+1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.31

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.78

2.79

+1.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.54

10.62

+7.92

EMCS vs. DEUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMCS Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the DEUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMCS and DEUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMCSDEUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

1.75

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.61

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.64

-0.08

Drawdowns

EMCS vs. DEUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMCS drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, which is greater than DEUS's maximum drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCS and DEUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMCSDEUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.86%

-40.47%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.32%

-6.83%

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.73%

-16.69%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.06%

-20.89%

-21.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.62%

-4.34%

-12.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

1.80%

+1.89%

Volatility

EMCS vs. DEUS - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) at 2.97%. This indicates that EMCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMCSDEUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.71%

2.97%

+6.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.36%

8.17%

+11.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.33%

11.02%

+11.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.63%

15.55%

+5.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.65%

17.98%

+3.67%

EMCS vs. DEUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMCS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DEUS's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EMCS vs. DEUS - Dividend Comparison

EMCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than DEUS's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
1.45%1.59%1.36%1.49%1.74%1.14%1.61%1.65%1.77%1.31%2.75%
EMCS
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF
1.23%1.66%0.67%3.07%2.26%1.46%1.40%3.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMCS and DEUS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMCS has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to DEUS (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCS dropped -44.86% vs DEUS's -40.47%.

On 5-year performance, DEUS leads with 9.49% vs 8.46% for EMCS. On fees, EMCS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DEUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DEUS has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMCS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DEUS.

DEUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.23% for EMCS.

EMCS is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DEUS is Mid Cap Blend Equities. EMCS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index, while DEUS tracks Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMCS and 0.17% for DEUS.

EMCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMCS and DEUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer