EMCR vs. USSG
EMCR (Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF) and USSG (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMCR is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net, while USSG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Leaders. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMCR returned 8.83%/yr vs 14.04%/yr for USSG. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMCR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for USSG.
Performance
EMCR vs. USSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCR achieves a 22.13% return, which is significantly higher than USSG's 10.71% return.
EMCR
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- 22.13%
- 6M
- 24.53%
- 1Y
- 47.15%
- 3Y*
- 23.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- —
USSG
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- 1Y
- 29.11%
- 3Y*
- 22.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- —
EMCR vs. USSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 22.13% | 33.25% | 9.69% | 10.55% | -18.73% | 5.54% | 13.49% | 13.32% |
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 10.71% | 18.97% | 23.45% | 29.17% | -20.33% | 31.83% | 18.71% | 19.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCR and USSG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between EMCR and USSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMCR vs. USSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMCR
USSG
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
EMCR
USSG
Financial Services
EMCR
USSG
Consumer Cyclical
EMCR
USSG
Communication Services
EMCR
USSG
Industrials
EMCR
USSG
Healthcare
EMCR
USSG
Basic Materials
EMCR
USSG
Consumer Defensive
EMCR
USSG
Real Estate
EMCR
USSG
Utilities
EMCR
USSG
Energy
EMCR
USSG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMCR vs. USSG — Risk / Return Rank
EMCR
USSG
EMCR vs. USSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMCR | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.39 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 2.61 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.08 | 11.19 | +1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMCR | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.22 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.80 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.85 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
EMCR vs. USSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCR drawdown since its inception was -34.28%, roughly equal to the maximum USSG drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCR and USSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCR | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.28% | -34.10% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.84% | -11.20% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.38% | -20.00% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.28% | -27.00% | -7.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -0.12% | -2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.33% | -5.60% | -3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 2.61% | +1.00% |
Volatility
EMCR vs. USSG - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) at 3.86%. This indicates that EMCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMCR | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | 3.86% | +4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.94% | 10.09% | +6.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.62% | 13.15% | +6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 17.59% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 20.16% | -0.30% |
EMCR vs. USSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMCR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than USSG's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMCR vs. USSG - Dividend Comparison
EMCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than USSG's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 1.99% | 2.43% | 6.62% | 1.95% | 3.05% | 1.83% | 1.75% | 3.15% | 0.19% |
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.13% | 1.42% | 1.21% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMCR and USSG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMCR has higher volatility (8.00%) compared to USSG (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCR dropped -34.28% vs USSG's -34.10%.
On 5-year performance, USSG leads with 14.04% vs 8.83% for EMCR. On fees, USSG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, USSG has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USSG has performed better with a 14.04% return vs 8.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USSG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EMCR.
EMCR has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.94% for USSG.
EMCR is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while USSG is Large Cap Growth Equities. EMCR tracks Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net, while USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMCR and 0.10% for USSG.
EMCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMCR and USSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer