PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMCR vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMCR vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMCR achieves a 22.13% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 97.72% return.


EMCR

1D
-0.87%
1M
5.56%
YTD
22.13%
6M
24.53%
1Y
47.15%
3Y*
23.37%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*

USO

1D
-2.92%
1M
-5.15%
YTD
97.72%
6M
91.54%
1Y
97.20%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
23.67%
10Y*
3.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMCR vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMCR
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF
22.13%33.25%9.69%10.55%-18.73%5.54%13.49%22.41%-1.76%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
97.72%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between EMCR and USO is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2018

0.17

The correlation between EMCR and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMCR vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMCR
EMCR Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EMCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCR Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMCR vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMCRUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.37

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

4.79

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.08

9.00

+4.08

EMCR vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMCR Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the USO Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMCR and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMCRUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.21

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.66

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

-0.18

+0.78

Drawdowns

EMCR vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMCR drawdown since its inception was -34.28%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCR and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMCRUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.28%

-98.19%

+63.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.84%

-20.39%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

-26.05%

+7.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.28%

-36.23%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-85.45%

+83.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.33%

-75.30%

+65.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

10.84%

-7.23%

Volatility

EMCR vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) is 8.00%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.97%. This indicates that EMCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMCRUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.00%

14.97%

-6.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.94%

38.35%

-21.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.62%

44.32%

-24.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.29%

36.09%

-16.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

39.00%

-19.14%

EMCR vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMCR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMCR vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

EMCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EMCR
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF
1.99%2.43%6.62%1.95%3.05%1.83%1.75%3.15%0.19%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMCR and USO have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (14.97%) compared to EMCR (8.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCR dropped -34.28% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 5-year performance, USO leads with 23.67% vs 8.83% for EMCR. On fees, EMCR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EMCR has been the lower-risk option at 8.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USO has performed better with a 23.67% return vs 8.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMCR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

EMCR has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

EMCR is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. EMCR tracks Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMCR and 0.86% for USO.

EMCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMCR and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer