PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMCR vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMCR vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMCR achieves a 15.90% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -27.96% return.


EMCR

1D
-3.22%
1M
-3.09%
6M
9.60%
YTD
15.90%
1Y
33.48%
3Y*
19.46%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*

SMST

1D
5.26%
1M
44.38%
6M
-15.07%
YTD
-27.96%
1Y
240.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMCR vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EMCR and SMST is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMCR vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMCR
EMCR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EMCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCR Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMCR vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMCRSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.83

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.51

5.47

+3.04

EMCR vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMCR Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMCR and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMCR vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMCR drawdown since its inception was -34.28%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCR and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMCRSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.28%

-99.25%

+64.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.84%

-85.39%

+71.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.49%

-97.17%

+89.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.26%

-90.89%

+81.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

44.09%

-40.15%

Volatility

EMCR vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) is 10.61%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 56.59%. This indicates that EMCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMCRSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.61%

56.59%

-45.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.64%

135.88%

-115.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.78%

149.23%

-126.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.99%

167.74%

-147.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.22%

167.74%

-147.52%

EMCR vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMCR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMCR vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

EMCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EMCR
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF
1.51%2.43%6.62%1.95%3.05%1.83%1.75%3.15%0.19%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMCR and SMST have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (56.59%) compared to EMCR (10.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCR dropped -34.28% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 240.03% vs 33.48% for EMCR. On fees, EMCR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EMCR has been the lower-risk option at 10.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 240.03% return vs 33.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMCR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

EMCR has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

EMCR is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMCR and 1.29% for SMST.

SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMCR and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer