PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMCIX vs. DLENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMCIX vs. DLENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund (EMCIX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMCIX achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly higher than DLENX's 1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, EMCIX has underperformed DLENX with an annualized return of 2.62%, while DLENX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.61% annualized return.


EMCIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
3.42%
6M
3.53%
1Y
9.30%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
-1.62%
10Y*
2.62%

DLENX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.50%
1Y
6.00%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
3.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMCIX vs. DLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund
3.42%8.81%8.28%6.01%-22.35%-6.47%7.34%11.08%-3.92%13.02%
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
1.16%8.11%7.92%9.36%-15.50%1.71%4.66%11.71%-3.54%8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EMCIX and DLENX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2010

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between EMCIX and DLENX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMCIX vs. DLENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMCIX
EMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
EMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

DLENX
DLENX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMCIX vs. DLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund (EMCIX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMCIXDLENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.76

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.43

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.57

13.64

-1.08

EMCIX vs. DLENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the DLENX Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMCIX and DLENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMCIXDLENXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

3.26

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

0.41

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.78

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.95

-0.94

Drawdowns

EMCIX vs. DLENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMCIX drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, which is greater than DLENX's maximum drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCIX and DLENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMCIXDLENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-25.64%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-1.83%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.02%

-4.58%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.20%

-25.64%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

-25.64%

-10.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.05%

-0.11%

-7.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.58%

-3.61%

-9.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

0.46%

+0.30%

Volatility

EMCIX vs. DLENX - Volatility Comparison

Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund (EMCIX) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) at 0.68%. This indicates that EMCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMCIXDLENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

0.68%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.95%

1.43%

+3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.55%

1.92%

+3.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

4.55%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

4.65%

+1.41%

EMCIX vs. DLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMCIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than DLENX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMCIX vs. DLENX - Dividend Comparison

EMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.41%, more than DLENX's 5.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
5.32%5.33%5.71%5.29%4.49%3.74%4.11%4.49%3.57%4.07%4.29%4.94%
EMCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund
9.41%7.69%4.92%5.23%6.67%4.28%5.13%6.62%6.62%4.89%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMCIX and DLENX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMCIX has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to DLENX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCIX dropped -36.20% vs DLENX's -25.64%.

DLENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMCIX and DLENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer