EMCB vs. KHYB
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB) and KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB).
EMCB and KHYB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMCB is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Mar 8, 2012. KHYB is a passively managed fund by KraneShares that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan Asia Credit Index Non-Investment Grade Corporate Index.. It was launched on Jun 26, 2018.
Performance
EMCB vs. KHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMCB vs. KHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCB WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | -0.16% | 8.19% | 7.11% | 8.76% | -12.98% | -0.62% | 8.60% | 13.43% | 0.63% |
KHYB KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF | -0.41% | 9.59% | 10.79% | 3.50% | -10.15% | -12.32% | 2.00% | 8.87% | 0.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCB achieves a -0.16% return, which is significantly higher than KHYB's -0.41% return.
EMCB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- YTD
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.33%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.24%
KHYB
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 7.21%
- 3Y*
- 7.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMCB vs. KHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMCB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KHYB's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMCB vs. KHYB — Risk / Return Rank
EMCB
KHYB
EMCB vs. KHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB) and KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMCB | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 1.53 | -0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 2.08 | -0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.36 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.62 | +0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | 6.76 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMCB | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 1.53 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | -0.05 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.22 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCB and KHYB is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EMCB vs. KHYB - Dividend Comparison
EMCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, less than KHYB's 8.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCB WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 5.46% | 5.47% | 5.29% | 5.09% | 4.04% | 3.43% | 3.85% | 4.17% | 4.20% | 4.04% | 4.08% | 5.09% |
KHYB KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF | 8.01% | 7.59% | 10.11% | 15.55% | 9.67% | 6.22% | 4.76% | 4.86% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMCB vs. KHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCB drawdown since its inception was -22.81%, smaller than the maximum KHYB drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCB and KHYB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCB | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.81% | -33.63% | +10.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.43% | -4.29% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.50% | -33.01% | +11.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -3.43% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -9.89% | +5.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 1.05% | -0.21% |
Volatility
EMCB vs. KHYB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB) is 1.10%, while KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that EMCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KHYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMCB | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 2.25% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 2.74% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.47% | 4.73% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.02% | 6.30% | +0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.51% | 5.74% | +2.77% |