EMCB vs. GDMN
EMCB (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EMCB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMCB returned 7.72%/yr vs 56.12%/yr for GDMN. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMCB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.
Performance
EMCB vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCB achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -17.89% return.
EMCB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 6.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 4.25%
GDMN
- 1D
- -5.34%
- 1M
- -15.68%
- YTD
- -17.89%
- 6M
- -24.58%
- 1Y
- 50.67%
- 3Y*
- 56.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMCB vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCB WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 2.12% | 8.19% | 7.11% | 8.76% | -12.98% | 0.24% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -17.89% | 237.09% | 28.23% | 12.97% | -14.62% | 6.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCB and GDMN is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMCB vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank
EMCB
GDMN
EMCB vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMCB | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.18 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 1.04 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 2.68 | +4.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMCB vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCB drawdown since its inception was -22.81%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCB and GDMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCB | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.81% | -52.82% | +30.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.07% | -48.76% | +45.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.20% | -48.76% | +44.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -46.10% | +45.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -19.14% | +14.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 19.00% | -18.13% |
Volatility
EMCB vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB) is 1.47%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 22.22%. This indicates that EMCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMCB | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 22.22% | -20.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.06% | 55.20% | -52.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 64.10% | -60.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.93% | 48.22% | -41.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.46% | 48.22% | -39.76% |
EMCB vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMCB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMCB vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison
EMCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than GDMN's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCB WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 5.35% | 5.47% | 5.29% | 5.09% | 4.04% | 3.43% | 3.85% | 4.17% | 4.20% | 4.04% | 4.08% | 5.09% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 3.29% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMCB and GDMN have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDMN has higher volatility (22.22%) compared to EMCB (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCB dropped -22.81% vs GDMN's -52.82%.
On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 56.12% vs 7.72% for EMCB. On fees, GDMN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, EMCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 56.12% return vs 7.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDMN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMCB.
EMCB has the higher dividend yield at 5.35%, compared with 3.29% for GDMN.
EMCB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EMCB and 0.45% for GDMN.
EMCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMCB and GDMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer