EMC vs. XLV

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

EMC (Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMC is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Global X, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. EMC is actively managed, while XLV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMC returned 15.25%/yr vs 7.12%/yr for XLV. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.

Performance

EMC vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMC achieves a 22.09% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.23% return.

EMC

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 22.09%
• 6M: 24.45%
• 1Y: 34.55%
• 3Y*: 15.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLV

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 4.90%
• YTD: -0.23%
• 6M: 0.67%
• 1Y: 15.00%
• 3Y*: 7.12%
• 5Y*: 6.00%
• 10Y*: 9.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMC vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF	22.09%	18.91%	3.75%	1.62%
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	-0.23%	14.50%	2.47%	4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between EMC and XLV is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2023	0.26

Return for Risk

EMC vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMC

EMC Risk / Return Rank: 49
EMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
EMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
EMC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
EMC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

XLV

XLV Risk / Return Rank: 30
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 28
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMC vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMC	XLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	0.97	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	1.55	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.17	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	1.38	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.27	3.31	+4.95

EMC vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMC and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMC vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMC drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMC and XLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMC	XLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.38%	-39.17%	+20.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.89%	-10.47%	-3.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.38%	-17.11%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.11%	-3.59%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-7.12%	+3.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.89%	4.37%	-0.48%

Volatility

EMC vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 4.90%. This indicates that EMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMC	XLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.45%	4.90%	+5.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.85%	10.60%	+9.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.04%	15.03%	+7.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.97%	14.75%	+4.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.97%	16.58%	+2.39%

EMC vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMC vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

EMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than XLV's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF	0.64%	0.78%	1.13%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.63%	1.60%	1.67%	1.59%	1.47%	1.33%	1.49%	2.17%	1.57%	1.47%	1.60%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMC and XLV in my portfolio?

EMC and XLV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMC or XLV?

EMC has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to XLV (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMC dropped -18.38% vs XLV's -39.17%.

Which ETF is better, EMC or XLV?

On 3-year performance, EMC leads with 15.25% vs 7.12% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMC or XLV?

Over the 3-year period, EMC has performed better with a 15.25% return vs 7.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMC or XLV?

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMC or XLV?

XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.64% for EMC.

What is the main difference between EMC and XLV?

EMC is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMC and 0.08% for XLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.