EMC vs. COPX
EMC (Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMC is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Global X, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. EMC is actively managed, while COPX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMC returned 17.56%/yr vs 37.36%/yr for COPX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
EMC vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMC having a 25.25% return and COPX slightly higher at 25.71%.
EMC
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 9.84%
- YTD
- 25.25%
- 6M
- 27.29%
- 1Y
- 39.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COPX
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- 17.74%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- 1Y
- 120.82%
- 3Y*
- 37.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 21.95%
EMC vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF | 25.25% | 18.91% | 3.75% | 1.90% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 25.71% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMC and COPX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2023 | 0.67 |
The correlation between EMC and COPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMC vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMC
COPX
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
EMC
COPX
-
Financial Services
EMC
COPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMC
COPX
-
Communication Services
EMC
COPX
-
Industrials
EMC
COPX
Basic Materials
EMC
COPX
Energy
EMC
COPX
-
Healthcare
EMC
COPX
-
Consumer Defensive
EMC
COPX
-
Real Estate
EMC
COPX
-
Utilities
EMC
-
COPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMC vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
EMC
COPX
EMC vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMC | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 4.37 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.54 | 14.00 | -3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMC | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 2.93 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.19 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
EMC vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMC drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMC and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMC | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -83.16% | +64.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.89% | -27.82% | +13.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.38% | -39.72% | +21.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -5.69% | +4.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -39.30% | +35.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 8.66% | -4.90% |
Volatility
EMC vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) is 9.03%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that EMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMC | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | 15.38% | -6.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | 35.68% | -17.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.68% | 41.41% | -20.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 36.51% | -17.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 35.55% | -17.00% |
EMC vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMC vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
EMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than COPX's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.13% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF | 0.63% | 0.78% | 1.13% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMC and COPX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (15.38%) compared to EMC (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMC dropped -18.38% vs COPX's -83.16%.
On 3-year performance, COPX leads with 37.36% vs 17.56% for EMC. On fees, COPX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, EMC has been the lower-risk option at 9.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, COPX has performed better with a 37.36% return vs 17.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COPX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMC.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.63% for EMC.
EMC is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while COPX is Materials. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMC and 0.65% for COPX.
COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMC and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer