EMC vs. BBEM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMC (Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF) and BBEM (JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. EMC is actively managed, while BBEM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMC returned 17.56%/yr vs 23.00%/yr for BBEM. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBEM.

Performance

EMC vs. BBEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMC achieves a 25.25% return, which is significantly lower than BBEM's 27.02% return.

EMC

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: 9.84%
• YTD: 25.25%
• 6M: 27.29%
• 1Y: 39.53%
• 3Y*: 17.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBEM

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 9.46%
• YTD: 27.02%
• 6M: 29.37%
• 1Y: 53.50%
• 3Y*: 23.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMC vs. BBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF	25.25%	18.91%	3.75%	1.90%
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	27.02%	32.43%	5.61%	5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EMC and BBEM is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2023	0.94

The correlation between EMC and BBEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMC vs. BBEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMC	BBEM
Technology	42.4%	36.5%
Financial Services	22.7%	19.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	10.0%
Communication Services	8.1%	6.7%
Industrials	4.5%	8.1%
Basic Materials	3.5%	6.2%
Energy	3.0%	4.2%
Healthcare	2.2%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	3.0%
Real Estate	1.4%	1.0%
Utilities	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

EMC vs. BBEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMC

EMC Risk / Return Rank: 58
EMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
EMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
EMC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
EMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
EMC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

BBEM

BBEM Risk / Return Rank: 82
BBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMC vs. BBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMC	BBEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.76	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	3.64	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.51	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	4.10	-1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.54	16.16	-5.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMC vs. BBEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the BBEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMC and BBEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMC	BBEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	2.76	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.32	-0.45

Drawdowns

EMC vs. BBEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMC drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, which is greater than BBEM's maximum drawdown of -17.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMC and BBEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMC	BBEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.38%	-17.42%	-0.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.89%	-13.12%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.38%	-17.42%	-0.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-1.31%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-3.70%	-0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.76%	3.32%	+0.44%

Volatility

EMC vs. BBEM - Volatility Comparison

Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) at 8.59%. This indicates that EMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMC	BBEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.03%	8.59%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.24%	17.20%	+1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.68%	19.49%	+1.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.55%	17.50%	+1.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.55%	17.50%	+1.05%

EMC vs. BBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BBEM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMC vs. BBEM - Dividend Comparison

EMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than BBEM's 4.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	4.59%	5.86%	2.73%	1.94%
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF	0.63%	0.78%	1.13%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMC and BBEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, EMC and BBEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EMC or BBEM?

EMC has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to BBEM (8.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMC dropped -18.38% vs BBEM's -17.42%.

Which ETF is better, EMC or BBEM?

On 3-year performance, BBEM leads with 23.00% vs 17.56% for EMC. On fees, BBEM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMC or BBEM?

Over the 3-year period, BBEM has performed better with a 23.00% return vs 17.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMC or BBEM?

BBEM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMC or BBEM?

BBEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 0.63% for EMC.

What is the main difference between EMC and BBEM?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMC and 0.15% for BBEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.