EMBX vs. BIZD
EMBX (VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF) and BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMBX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by VanEck, while BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. EMBX is actively managed, while BIZD is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMBX returned 5.10%/yr vs 7.73%/yr for BIZD. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMBX charges 0.76%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for BIZD.
Performance
EMBX vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMBX achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -10.23% return. Over the past 10 years, EMBX has underperformed BIZD with an annualized return of 5.10%, while BIZD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.73% annualized return.
EMBX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 3.53%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- 12.08%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- 5.10%
BIZD
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -10.23%
- 6M
- -8.96%
- 1Y
- -13.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 7.73%
EMBX vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBX VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 3.53% | 18.80% | 3.09% | 9.34% | -7.21% | -4.30% | 11.57% | 13.10% | -6.21% | 11.97% |
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -10.23% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | -8.51% | 36.25% | -7.12% | 30.87% | -6.88% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMBX and BIZD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2013 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMBX vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank
EMBX
BIZD
EMBX vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBX) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMBX | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.89 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | -0.62 | +2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.86 | -1.03 | +10.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMBX vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMBX drawdown since its inception was -25.11%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMBX and BIZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMBX | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.11% | -55.44% | +30.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.14% | -22.22% | +17.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.41% | -22.56% | +15.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.09% | -22.91% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.11% | -55.44% | +30.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -20.38% | +19.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -6.77% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 13.42% | -12.19% |
Volatility
EMBX vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBX) is 2.07%, while VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that EMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMBX | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.07% | 5.30% | -3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.08% | 15.18% | -10.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.93% | 18.47% | -12.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.14% | 17.44% | -11.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.67% | 21.77% | -15.10% |
EMBX vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMBX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than BIZD's 12.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMBX vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison
EMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, less than BIZD's 14.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 14.07% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
EMBX VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.39% | 6.95% | 8.20% | 5.49% | 8.21% | 5.50% | 6.56% | 7.89% | 7.25% | 7.66% | 3.94% | 6.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMBX and BIZD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIZD has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to EMBX (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMBX dropped -25.11% vs BIZD's -55.44%.
On 10-year performance, BIZD leads with 7.73% vs 5.10% for EMBX. On fees, EMBX is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, EMBX has been the lower-risk option at 2.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BIZD has performed better with a 7.73% return vs 5.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMBX is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 14.07%, compared with 5.39% for EMBX.
EMBX is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while BIZD is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for EMBX and 12.86% for BIZD.
EMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMBX and BIZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer