EMBJ vs. TRGP
EMBJ (Embraer S.A) and TRGP (Targa Resources Corp.) are both stocks. EMBJ operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while TRGP operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, EMBJ returned 11.48%/yr vs 25.83%/yr for TRGP. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EMBJ vs. TRGP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMBJ achieves a -4.70% return, which is significantly lower than TRGP's 44.80% return. Over the past 10 years, EMBJ has underperformed TRGP with an annualized return of 11.48%, while TRGP has yielded a comparatively higher 25.83% annualized return.
EMBJ
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 5.87%
- YTD
- -4.70%
- 6M
- -4.89%
- 1Y
- 17.87%
- 3Y*
- 62.51%
- 5Y*
- 31.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
TRGP
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- 44.80%
- 6M
- 46.26%
- 1Y
- 58.53%
- 3Y*
- 59.30%
- 5Y*
- 45.32%
- 10Y*
- 25.83%
EMBJ vs. TRGP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBJ Embraer S.A | -4.70% | 77.16% | 98.81% | 68.80% | -38.42% | 160.65% | -65.06% | -11.93% | -7.30% | 26.56% |
TRGP Targa Resources Corp. | 44.80% | 5.65% | 110.12% | 21.01% | 43.71% | 100.15% | -32.48% | 23.98% | -19.88% | -7.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMBJ and TRGP is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2010 | 0.28 |
The correlation between EMBJ and TRGP shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EMBJ:
$1.71
TRGP:
$13.11
EMBJ:
35.68
TRGP:
20.17
EMBJ:
1.61
TRGP:
0.22
EMBJ:
1.40
TRGP:
2.62
EMBJ:
$7.95B
TRGP:
$16.38B
EMBJ:
$1.40B
TRGP:
$3.62B
EMBJ:
$602.35M
TRGP:
$4.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMBJ vs. TRGP — Risk / Return Rank
EMBJ
TRGP
EMBJ vs. TRGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Embraer S.A (EMBJ) and Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMBJ | TRGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.34 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 3.61 | -3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.22 | 11.68 | -10.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMBJ vs. TRGP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMBJ drawdown since its inception was -90.53%, roughly equal to the maximum TRGP drawdown of -95.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMBJ and TRGP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMBJ | TRGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.53% | -95.21% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.21% | -16.30% | -15.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.21% | -31.61% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.20% | -31.61% | -25.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.26% | -90.78% | +5.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.21% | -4.42% | -18.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.26% | -33.51% | -6.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.64% | 5.03% | +9.61% |
Volatility
EMBJ vs. TRGP - Volatility Comparison
Embraer S.A (EMBJ) has a higher volatility of 11.34% compared to Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) at 8.51%. This indicates that EMBJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMBJ | TRGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.34% | 8.51% | +2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.79% | 18.53% | +16.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.56% | 27.46% | +16.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.81% | 31.74% | +15.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.70% | 47.65% | +2.05% |
Dividends
EMBJ vs. TRGP - Dividend Comparison
EMBJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than TRGP's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBJ Embraer S.A | 1.50% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 1.65% | 0.45% | 0.56% |
TRGP Targa Resources Corp. | 1.61% | 2.03% | 1.54% | 2.13% | 1.90% | 0.77% | 4.59% | 8.92% | 10.11% | 7.52% | 6.49% | 12.53% |
Financials
EMBJ vs. TRGP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Embraer S.A and Targa Resources Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EMBJ vs. TRGP - Profitability Comparison
EMBJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embraer S.A reported a gross profit of 259.27M and revenue of 1.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.0%.
TRGP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Targa Resources Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
EMBJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embraer S.A reported an operating income of 73.95M and revenue of 1.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
TRGP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Targa Resources Corp. reported an operating income of 846.90M and revenue of 4.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
EMBJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embraer S.A reported a net income of 33.26M and revenue of 1.44B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.
TRGP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Targa Resources Corp. reported a net income of 479.60M and revenue of 4.09B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMBJ and TRGP have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMBJ has higher volatility (11.34%) compared to TRGP (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMBJ dropped -90.53% vs TRGP's -95.21%.
TRGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMBJ and TRGP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer