EMBC vs. RMS.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about Embecta Corp (EMBC) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA).
Performance
EMBC vs. RMS.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMBC vs. RMS.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBC Embecta Corp | -24.51% | -39.64% | 13.56% | -23.11% | -16.21% |
RMS.PA Hermès International Société en commandite par actions | -25.11% | 4.75% | 14.81% | 37.91% | 10.65% |
Different Trading Currencies
EMBC is traded in USD, while RMS.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the RMS.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EMBC having a -24.51% return and RMS.PA slightly lower at -25.11%.
EMBC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -13.84%
- YTD
- -24.51%
- 6M
- -35.61%
- 1Y
- -27.03%
- 3Y*
- -29.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RMS.PA
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -23.09%
- YTD
- -25.11%
- 6M
- -23.63%
- 1Y
- -27.75%
- 3Y*
- -1.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 19.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMBC vs. RMS.PA — Risk / Return Rank
EMBC
RMS.PA
EMBC vs. RMS.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Embecta Corp (EMBC) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMBC | RMS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | -0.96 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | -1.29 | +0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.85 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | -0.76 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | -1.85 | +0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMBC | RMS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.52 | -0.96 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | 0.53 | -0.96 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMBC and RMS.PA is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EMBC vs. RMS.PA - Dividend Comparison
EMBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, more than RMS.PA's 1.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBC Embecta Corp | 6.79% | 5.05% | 2.91% | 3.17% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RMS.PA Hermès International Société en commandite par actions | 1.71% | 1.23% | 1.08% | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.30% | 0.52% | 0.68% | 1.34% | 0.84% | 0.86% | 0.95% |
Drawdowns
EMBC vs. RMS.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMBC drawdown since its inception was -72.35%, which is greater than RMS.PA's maximum drawdown of -50.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMBC and RMS.PA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMBC | RMS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.35% | -47.65% | -24.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.47% | -37.88% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.48% | -42.60% | -28.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.94% | -10.89% | -33.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.43% | 17.61% | +2.82% |
Volatility
EMBC vs. RMS.PA - Volatility Comparison
Embecta Corp (EMBC) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) have volatilities of 8.85% and 9.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMBC | RMS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.85% | 9.14% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.98% | 20.57% | +8.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.73% | 28.74% | +23.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.09% | 30.33% | +25.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.09% | 26.54% | +29.55% |
Financials
EMBC vs. RMS.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Embecta Corp and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities