PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMA vs. NPI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

EMA vs. NPI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emera Inc (EMA) and Northland Power Inc. (NPI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMA vs. NPI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EMA
Emera Inc
6.49%12.99%
NPI.TO
Northland Power Inc.
29.86%-9.15%
Different Trading Currencies

EMA is traded in USD, while NPI.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the NPI.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EMA:

$15.65B

NPI.TO:

CA$6.10B

EPS

EMA:

$3.62

NPI.TO:

-CA$0.62

PS Ratio

EMA:

1.77

NPI.TO:

2.50

PB Ratio

EMA:

1.31

NPI.TO:

1.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

EMA:

$8.79B

NPI.TO:

CA$2.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EMA:

$3.43B

NPI.TO:

CA$1.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

EMA:

$3.07B

NPI.TO:

CA$887.84M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMA achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than NPI.TO's 29.86% return.


EMA

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
6.49%
6M
10.52%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NPI.TO

1D
0.84%
1M
4.79%
YTD
29.86%
6M
2.25%
1Y
28.73%
3Y*
-6.36%
5Y*
-8.99%
10Y*
5.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMA vs. NPI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMA

NPI.TO
NPI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NPI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NPI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMA vs. NPI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emera Inc (EMA) and Northland Power Inc. (NPI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EMA vs. NPI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMANPI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.81

0.43

+1.38

Correlation

The correlation between EMA and NPI.TO is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EMA vs. NPI.TO - Dividend Comparison

EMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than NPI.TO's 4.20% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMA
Emera Inc
3.06%2.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NPI.TO
Northland Power Inc.
4.20%6.50%11.02%6.95%5.01%5.04%4.11%6.77%5.53%4.67%4.64%5.79%

Drawdowns

EMA vs. NPI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMA drawdown since its inception was -5.93%, smaller than the maximum NPI.TO drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMA and NPI.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMANPI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-58.76%

+52.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-37.70%

+34.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-11.88%

+10.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.05%

Volatility

EMA vs. NPI.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMANPI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.66%

37.42%

-23.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.66%

29.57%

-15.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.66%

28.66%

-15.00%

Financials

EMA vs. NPI.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emera Inc and Northland Power Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
2.02B
722.84M
(EMA) Total Revenue
(NPI.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. EMA values in USD, NPI.TO values in CAD

EMA vs. NPI.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Emera Inc and Northland Power Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
16.6%
47.0%
Portfolio components
EMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Emera Inc reported a gross profit of 334.73M and revenue of 2.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.6%.

NPI.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Northland Power Inc. reported a gross profit of 339.72M and revenue of 722.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.0%.

EMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Emera Inc reported an operating income of 212.83M and revenue of 2.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

NPI.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Northland Power Inc. reported an operating income of 285.85M and revenue of 722.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 39.6%.

EMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Emera Inc reported a net income of 86.93M and revenue of 2.02B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

NPI.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Northland Power Inc. reported a net income of 245.34M and revenue of 722.84M, resulting in a net margin of 33.9%.