PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EM1C.DE vs. FRCK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EM1C.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EM1C.DE achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly higher than FRCK.DE's 1.67% return.


EM1C.DE

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.38%
YTD
2.30%
6M
2.32%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
2.23%
10Y*

FRCK.DE

1D
0.27%
1M
1.11%
YTD
1.67%
6M
2.34%
1Y
10.92%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
1.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EM1C.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EM1C.DE
VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF
2.30%4.53%3.69%6.44%-4.38%-2.30%-6.16%12.05%-4.25%-3.96%
FRCK.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
1.67%12.81%5.36%9.70%-22.07%-3.88%2.79%11.04%-7.01%3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between EM1C.DE and FRCK.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2017

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EM1C.DE vs. FRCK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EM1C.DE
EM1C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EM1C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FRCK.DE
FRCK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FRCK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EM1C.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EM1C.DEFRCK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.39

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.42

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

10.09

-3.33

EM1C.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EM1C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the FRCK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EM1C.DE and FRCK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EM1C.DEFRCK.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.03

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.02

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.17

-0.08

Drawdowns

EM1C.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EM1C.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, smaller than the maximum FRCK.DE drawdown of -32.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EM1C.DE and FRCK.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EM1C.DEFRCK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.83%

-32.71%

+13.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.42%

-4.49%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.20%

-7.78%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.53%

-32.71%

+24.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.97%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.00%

-8.76%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.08%

-0.04%

Volatility

EM1C.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE) is 1.55%, while UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) has a volatility of 1.80%. This indicates that EM1C.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRCK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EM1C.DEFRCK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

1.80%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.15%

4.38%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.03%

5.38%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.03%

9.01%

-1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.06%

9.29%

-1.23%

EM1C.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EM1C.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FRCK.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

EM1C.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EM1C.DE nor FRCK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EM1C.DE
VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.19%
FRCK.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EM1C.DE and FRCK.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FRCK.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRCK.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EM1C.DE.

EM1C.DE tracks JP Morgan GBI-Emerging Markets Global Core, while FRCK.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EM1C.DE and 0.28% for FRCK.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EM1C.DE and FRCK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer