ELVA vs. CAH
ELVA (Electrovaya Inc. Common Shares) and CAH (Cardinal Health, Inc.) are both stocks. ELVA operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while CAH operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, ELVA returned 2.89%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for CAH. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ELVA vs. CAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELVA achieves a 20.25% return, which is significantly higher than CAH's 9.47% return. Over the past 10 years, ELVA has underperformed CAH with an annualized return of 2.89%, while CAH has yielded a comparatively higher 14.31% annualized return.
ELVA
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 20.25%
- 6M
- 43.50%
- 1Y
- 181.07%
- 3Y*
- 37.56%
- 5Y*
- 9.63%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
CAH
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 9.47%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 40.25%
- 3Y*
- 38.77%
- 5Y*
- 33.47%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
ELVA vs. CAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELVA Electrovaya Inc. Common Shares | 20.25% | 218.55% | -18.95% | -17.30% | 2.78% | -38.98% | 686.67% | 48.08% | -80.52% | -67.02% |
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 9.47% | 76.25% | 19.01% | 34.15% | 54.08% | -0.40% | 10.09% | 18.04% | -24.50% | -12.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELVA and CAH is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2016 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
ELVA:
$490.77M
CAH:
$52.83B
ELVA:
$0.11
CAH:
$6.55
ELVA:
87.86
CAH:
34.17
ELVA:
1.04
CAH:
0.81
ELVA:
6.21
CAH:
0.21
ELVA:
$70.74M
CAH:
$250.55B
ELVA:
$22.01M
CAH:
$9.23B
ELVA:
$6.86M
CAH:
$2.79B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELVA vs. CAH — Risk / Return Rank
ELVA
CAH
ELVA vs. CAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Electrovaya Inc. Common Shares (ELVA) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ELVA | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 2.02 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.01 | 5.31 | +3.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ELVA vs. CAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELVA drawdown since its inception was -96.90%, which is greater than CAH's maximum drawdown of -61.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELVA and CAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELVA | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.90% | -61.93% | -34.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.42% | -20.42% | -24.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.19% | -20.42% | -43.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.78% | -22.80% | -43.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.90% | -46.13% | -50.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.01% | -2.39% | -38.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.62% | -15.94% | -57.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.71% | 7.75% | +10.96% |
Volatility
ELVA vs. CAH - Volatility Comparison
Electrovaya Inc. Common Shares (ELVA) has a higher volatility of 27.27% compared to Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) at 7.19%. This indicates that ELVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELVA | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.27% | 7.19% | +20.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.77% | 20.32% | +43.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.18% | 30.30% | +53.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.12% | 25.24% | +43.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.10% | 29.26% | +56.84% |
Dividends
ELVA vs. CAH - Dividend Comparison
ELVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 0.91% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.98% | 2.57% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 3.80% | 4.24% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 1.68% |
ELVA Electrovaya Inc. Common Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ELVA vs. CAH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Electrovaya Inc. Common Shares and Cardinal Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ELVA vs. CAH - Profitability Comparison
ELVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electrovaya Inc. Common Shares reported a gross profit of 5.51M and revenue of 17.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.
CAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.50B and revenue of 60.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.1%.
ELVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electrovaya Inc. Common Shares reported an operating income of 1.52M and revenue of 17.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%.
CAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported an operating income of 509.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
ELVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electrovaya Inc. Common Shares reported a net income of 1.00M and revenue of 17.80M, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
CAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a net income of 399.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ELVA and CAH have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ELVA has higher volatility (27.27%) compared to CAH (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELVA dropped -96.90% vs CAH's -61.93%.
ELVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ELVA and CAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer