PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELPC vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ELPC vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Companhia Paranaense de Energia (ELPC) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELPC achieves a 30.74% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 15.22% return.


ELPC

1D
-2.88%
1M
0.00%
6M
24.57%
YTD
30.74%
1Y
55.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQM

1D
-1.65%
1M
-3.18%
6M
13.83%
YTD
15.22%
1Y
27.34%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
15.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELPC vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ELPC
Companhia Paranaense de Energia
30.74%89.60%-30.59%3.55%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
15.22%20.85%25.68%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ELPC and QQQM is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2023

0.27

The correlation between ELPC and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELPC vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELPC
ELPC Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ELPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ELPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELPC vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Companhia Paranaense de Energia (ELPC) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ELPCQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.30

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.15

8.14

+0.02

ELPC vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELPC Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELPC and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ELPC vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELPC drawdown since its inception was -31.85%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELPC and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELPCQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.85%

-35.04%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.54%

-11.96%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.48%

-5.28%

-9.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.22%

-8.15%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.82%

3.37%

+3.45%

Volatility

ELPC vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Companhia Paranaense de Energia (ELPC) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 7.39%. This indicates that ELPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELPCQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.78%

7.39%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.71%

15.34%

+11.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.95%

18.54%

+19.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.64%

22.65%

+14.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.64%

22.30%

+15.34%

Dividends

ELPC vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

ELPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, more than QQQM's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ELPC
Companhia Paranaense de Energia
6.98%2.86%5.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.45%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


ELPC and QQQM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ELPC has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to QQQM (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELPC dropped -31.85% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELPC and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer