PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELFY vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ELFY vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF (ELFY) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELFY achieves a 29.94% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.64% return.


ELFY

1D
3.42%
1M
3.55%
YTD
29.94%
6M
28.11%
1Y
50.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RBIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.40%
YTD
2.64%
6M
2.73%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELFY vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ELFY and RBIL is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2025

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELFY vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELFY
ELFY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ELFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELFY Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ELFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELFY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELFY vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF (ELFY) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ELFYRBILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.69

4.93

-2.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.51

7.79

-4.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

2.36

-0.92

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.10

17.08

-10.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.46

70.71

-51.24

ELFY vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELFY Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELFY and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ELFYRBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

4.93

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.42

4.24

-0.82

Drawdowns

ELFY vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELFY drawdown since its inception was -8.37%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELFY and RBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELFYRBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.37%

-0.50%

-7.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.37%

-0.27%

-8.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-0.06%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

0.07%

+2.55%

Volatility

ELFY vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF (ELFY) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that ELFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELFYRBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

0.30%

+6.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

0.79%

+14.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.96%

0.92%

+18.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.01%

1.05%

+17.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.01%

1.05%

+17.96%

ELFY vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELFY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

ELFY vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

ELFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ELFY and RBIL have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ELFY has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELFY dropped -8.37% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

On 1-year performance, ELFY leads with 50.68% vs 4.50% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ELFY has performed better with a 50.68% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ELFY.

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.81% for ELFY.

ELFY is categorized as Utilities Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ELFY tracks Ladenburg Thalmann Electrification Infrastructure Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ELFY and 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.93 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELFY and RBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer