ELD vs. EMHC
ELD (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund) and EMHC (SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. ELD is actively managed, while EMHC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ELD returned 2.31%/yr vs 1.55%/yr for EMHC. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ELD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for EMHC.
Performance
ELD vs. EMHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELD achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than EMHC's 1.57% return.
ELD
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 10.72%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- 2.86%
EMHC
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.74%
- 5Y*
- 1.55%
- 10Y*
- —
ELD vs. EMHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELD WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | 0.74% | 21.77% | -4.56% | 14.29% | -9.25% | -4.06% |
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 1.57% | 14.07% | 3.52% | 10.06% | -17.75% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELD and EMHC is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELD vs. EMHC — Risk / Return Rank
ELD
EMHC
ELD vs. EMHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ELD | EMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.41 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.65 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.31 | 11.09 | -5.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ELD | EMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 2.14 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.17 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.22 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
ELD vs. EMHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELD drawdown since its inception was -31.92%, which is greater than EMHC's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELD and EMHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELD | EMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.92% | -28.03% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -4.37% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.89% | -7.67% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.56% | -28.03% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -0.32% | -2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -9.91% | -3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 1.04% | +0.98% |
Volatility
ELD vs. EMHC - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) at 1.89%. This indicates that ELD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELD | EMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 1.89% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 4.16% | +2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.52% | 5.43% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.93% | 9.06% | +1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.27% | 8.96% | +2.31% |
ELD vs. EMHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ELD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EMHC's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
ELD vs. EMHC - Dividend Comparison
ELD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, less than EMHC's 6.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELD WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | 5.82% | 5.38% | 5.75% | 4.85% | 5.29% | 4.98% | 4.70% | 4.92% | 6.30% | 4.68% | 4.86% | 5.57% |
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 6.11% | 6.16% | 5.95% | 5.12% | 5.11% | 2.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ELD and EMHC have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ELD has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to EMHC (1.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELD dropped -31.92% vs EMHC's -28.03%.
On 5-year performance, ELD leads with 2.31% vs 1.55% for EMHC. On fees, EMHC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, EMHC has been the lower-risk option at 1.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ELD has performed better with a 2.31% return vs 1.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMHC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ELD.
EMHC has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 5.82% for ELD.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ELD and 0.23% for EMHC.
EMHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ELD and EMHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer