PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELBIX vs. SEDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ELBIX vs. SEDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (ELBIX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELBIX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than SEDAX's 4.04% return. Over the past 10 years, ELBIX has underperformed SEDAX with an annualized return of 2.62%, while SEDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.42% annualized return.


ELBIX

1D
0.28%
1M
1.43%
YTD
1.24%
6M
2.24%
1Y
10.23%
3Y*
7.46%
5Y*
2.10%
10Y*
2.62%

SEDAX

1D
0.32%
1M
1.39%
YTD
4.04%
6M
4.76%
1Y
16.93%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
4.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELBIX vs. SEDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ELBIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund
1.24%19.17%-4.30%14.03%-10.00%-9.55%2.65%12.11%-7.02%13.54%
SEDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
4.04%20.33%3.13%12.86%-14.53%-4.93%4.68%15.55%-8.11%15.32%

Correlation

The correlation between ELBIX and SEDAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2011

0.77

The correlation between ELBIX and SEDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELBIX vs. SEDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELBIX
ELBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ELBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ELBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SEDAX
SEDAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SEDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SEDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELBIX vs. SEDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (ELBIX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ELBIXSEDAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

3.04

-1.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.18

4.80

-2.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.66

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

3.14

-1.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.76

12.71

-7.95

ELBIX vs. SEDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the SEDAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELBIX and SEDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ELBIXSEDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

3.04

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.52

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.53

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.42

-0.49

Drawdowns

ELBIX vs. SEDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELBIX drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, which is greater than SEDAX's maximum drawdown of -37.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELBIX and SEDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELBIXSEDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.77%

-37.03%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

-5.49%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.21%

-9.44%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.81%

-27.01%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.97%

-27.25%

+0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.43%

-0.32%

-16.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.50%

-6.79%

-18.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.36%

+0.76%

Volatility

ELBIX vs. SEDAX - Volatility Comparison

Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (ELBIX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX) have volatilities of 2.00% and 1.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELBIXSEDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

1.94%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.68%

4.98%

+0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.67%

5.68%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.71%

7.02%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.99%

8.43%

+0.56%

ELBIX vs. SEDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELBIX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SEDAX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

ELBIX vs. SEDAX - Dividend Comparison

ELBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, less than SEDAX's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ELBIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund
6.61%8.01%4.10%4.23%1.39%0.00%1.20%0.65%2.54%1.96%0.00%0.00%
SEDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
8.67%7.30%7.24%4.65%2.08%4.69%1.52%3.75%3.17%4.70%3.59%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ELBIX and SEDAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ELBIX has higher volatility (2.00%) compared to SEDAX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELBIX dropped -42.77% vs SEDAX's -37.03%.

SEDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELBIX and SEDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer