ELBIX vs. IMCDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ELBIX (Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund) and IMCDX (Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ELBIX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IMCDX.

Performance

ELBIX vs. IMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (ELBIX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ELBIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 0.67%
• 1Y: 8.19%
• 3Y*: 6.28%
• 5Y*: 2.22%
• 10Y*: 2.49%

IMCDX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELBIX vs. IMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ELBIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund	0.24%	19.17%	-4.30%	14.03%	-10.00%	-9.55%	2.65%	12.11%	-7.02%	13.54%
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	6.44%	8.51%	-13.79%	0.08%	8.35%	13.65%	-1.77%	9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ELBIX and IMCDX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2012	0.40

Return for Risk

ELBIX vs. IMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELBIX

ELBIX Risk / Return Rank: 19
ELBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
ELBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
ELBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
ELBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
ELBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

IMCDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELBIX vs. IMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (ELBIX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ELBIX	IMCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.61	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ELBIX	IMCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.25%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.47%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ELBIX	IMCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.74%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.70%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.95%	—	—

ELBIX vs. IMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELBIX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCDX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

ELBIX vs. IMCDX - Dividend Comparison

ELBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, while IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ELBIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund	6.68%	8.01%	4.10%	4.23%	1.39%	0.00%	1.20%	0.65%	2.54%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	4.08%	4.21%	3.80%	6.14%	4.64%	4.99%	5.30%	4.79%	5.22%	5.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ELBIX and IMCDX in my portfolio?

ELBIX and IMCDX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.