ELA vs. ASML
ELA (Envela Corporation) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. ELA operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical), while ASML operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ELA returned 37.01%/yr vs 32.64%/yr for ASML. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ELA vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ELA having a 58.52% return and ASML slightly lower at 57.62%. Over the past 10 years, ELA has outperformed ASML with an annualized return of 37.01%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively lower 32.64% annualized return.
ELA
- 1D
- -3.28%
- 1M
- -15.63%
- 6M
- 64.67%
- YTD
- 58.52%
- 1Y
- 277.40%
- 3Y*
- 57.58%
- 5Y*
- 35.46%
- 10Y*
- 37.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.72%
ASML
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- 6M
- 25.93%
- YTD
- 57.62%
- 1Y
- 144.96%
- 3Y*
- 36.59%
- 5Y*
- 17.68%
- 10Y*
- 32.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 26.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.17B | $3.33B | $3.44B | |
| $2.52M | $2.86M | $3.07M |
ELA vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELA Envela Corporation | 58.52% | 86.35% | 47.74% | -7.60% | 29.24% | -21.73% | 285.19% | 193.54% | -50.55% | -25.00% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 57.62% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 93.56% | -9.80% | 56.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELA and ASML is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 1995 | 0.07 |
The correlation between ELA and ASML shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ELA:
$550.69M
ASML:
$646.82B
ELA:
$0.86
ASML:
€27.54
ELA:
24.63
ASML:
52.83
ELA:
0.86
ASML:
3.48
ELA:
1.88
ASML:
15.91
ELA:
6.88
ASML:
25.66
ELA:
$293.04M
ASML:
€35.33B
ELA:
$63.57M
ASML:
€18.63B
ELA:
$27.22M
ASML:
€13.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELA vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank
ELA
ASML
ELA vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Envela Corporation (ELA) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ELA | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.42 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.80 | 6.64 | +3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.81 | 21.97 | +5.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ELA vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELA drawdown since its inception was -97.32%, which is greater than ASML's maximum drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELA and ASML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELA | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.32% | -90.00% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.50% | -21.95% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.05% | -45.38% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.53% | -56.84% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.03% | -56.84% | -21.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.56% | -15.53% | -11.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.45% | -28.04% | -29.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.03% | 6.62% | +3.41% |
Volatility
ELA vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Envela Corporation (ELA) is 9.84%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 13.85%. This indicates that ELA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELA | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.84% | 13.85% | -4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.40% | 37.36% | +13.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.52% | 46.09% | +25.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.78% | 43.31% | +10.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.16% | 39.16% | +26.00% |
Dividends
ELA vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison
ELA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.54% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
ELA Envela Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ELA vs. ASML - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Envela Corporation and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ELA vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison
ELA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Envela Corporation reported a gross profit of 13.38M and revenue of 56.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.6%.
ASML - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 5.04B and revenue of 9.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.
ELA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Envela Corporation reported an operating income of 5.10M and revenue of 56.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.
ASML - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.46B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.
ELA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Envela Corporation reported a net income of 4.17M and revenue of 56.77M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
ASML - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.92B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ELA and ASML have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASML has higher volatility (13.85%) compared to ELA (9.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELA dropped -97.32% vs ASML's -90.00%.
ELA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs 3.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ELA and ASML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer