ELA vs. ASML

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ELA (Envela Corporation) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. ELA operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical), while ASML operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ELA returned 44.94%/yr vs 34.11%/yr for ASML. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ELA vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Envela Corporation (ELA) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELA achieves a 80.34% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's 61.93% return. Over the past 10 years, ELA has outperformed ASML with an annualized return of 44.94%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively lower 34.11% annualized return.

ELA

• 1D: -2.07%
• 1M: 43.97%
• YTD: 80.34%
• 6M: 84.76%
• 1Y: 318.20%
• 3Y*: 47.63%
• 5Y*: 36.35%
• 10Y*: 44.94%

ASML

• 1D: 1.23%
• 1M: 24.54%
• YTD: 61.93%
• 6M: 51.85%
• 1Y: 132.84%
• 3Y*: 34.91%
• 5Y*: 21.59%
• 10Y*: 34.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELA vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ELA Envela Corporation	80.34%	86.35%	47.74%	-7.60%	29.24%	-21.73%	285.19%	193.54%	-50.55%	-25.00%
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	61.93%	56.51%	-7.70%	39.91%	-30.49%	64.13%	66.06%	93.56%	-9.80%	56.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ELA and ASML is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1995	0.07

The correlation between ELA and ASML shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap ELA : $626.50M ASML : $665.86B
EPS ELA : $0.81 ASML : $25.86
PE Ratio ELA : 29.93 ASML : 66.77
PEG Ratio ELA : 1.04 ASML : 4.39
PS Ratio ELA : 2.15 ASML : 19.84
PB Ratio ELA : 8.25 ASML : 31.97
Total Revenue (TTM) ELA : $291.15M ASML : $33.69B
Gross Profit (TTM) ELA : $62.58M ASML : $17.72B
EBITDA (TTM) ELA : $22.99M ASML : $12.99B

Return for Risk

ELA vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELA

ELA Risk / Return Rank: 97
ELA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ELA Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ELA Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ELA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ELA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

ASML

ASML Risk / Return Rank: 94
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELA vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Envela Corporation (ELA) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ELA	ASML	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.50	3.29	+1.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.54	3.71	+0.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.45	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.73	7.48	+7.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	46.47	20.18	+26.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ELA vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELA Sharpe Ratio is 4.50, which is higher than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELA and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ELA	ASML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.50	3.29	+1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.52	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.89	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.56	-0.48

Drawdowns

ELA vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELA drawdown since its inception was -97.32%, which is greater than ASML's maximum drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELA and ASML.

Drawdown Indicators

	ELA	ASML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.32%	-90.00%	-7.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.77%	-17.85%	-3.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.24%	-45.38%	-13.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.53%	-56.84%	-4.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.03%	-56.84%	-21.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.29%	0.00%	-12.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.66%	-28.15%	-29.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.90%	6.61%	+0.29%

Volatility

ELA vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

Envela Corporation (ELA) has a higher volatility of 28.22% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 14.67%. This indicates that ELA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ELA	ASML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.22%	14.67%	+13.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.00%	32.21%	+26.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.22%	40.58%	+30.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.38%	42.03%	+12.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.24%	38.50%	+27.74%

Dividends

ELA vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

ELA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	0.51%	0.97%	0.97%	0.86%	1.27%	0.50%	0.50%	1.40%	0.94%	0.64%	0.92%	0.73%
ELA Envela Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

ELA vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Envela Corporation and ASML Holding N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ELA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Envela Corporation reported a gross profit of 20.62M and revenue of 98.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

ASML - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.65B and revenue of 8.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.

ELA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Envela Corporation reported an operating income of 11.21M and revenue of 98.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.

ASML - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.16B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.

ELA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Envela Corporation reported a net income of 8.84M and revenue of 98.38M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

ASML - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.76B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ELA and ASML in my portfolio?

ELA and ASML have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ELA or ASML?

ELA has higher volatility (28.22%) compared to ASML (14.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELA dropped -97.32% vs ASML's -90.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ELA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.50 vs 3.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.