EL40.DE vs. IS3N.DE
EL40.DE (Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF ) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EL40.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets while IS3N.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EL40.DE returned 9.07%/yr vs 10.00%/yr for IS3N.DE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EL40.DE charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IS3N.DE.
Performance
EL40.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EL40.DE having a 26.76% return and IS3N.DE slightly lower at 25.82%. Over the past 10 years, EL40.DE has underperformed IS3N.DE with an annualized return of 9.07%, while IS3N.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.00% annualized return.
EL40.DE
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 26.76%
- 6M
- 26.78%
- 1Y
- 47.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.07%
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 26.34%
- 1Y
- 45.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
EL40.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EL40.DE Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF | 26.76% | 17.86% | 13.11% | 4.33% | -14.87% | 4.55% | 5.36% | 20.78% | -11.51% | 19.00% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.82% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | -14.09% | 7.38% | 7.07% | 21.01% | -11.06% | 20.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between EL40.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014 | 0.94 |
The correlation between EL40.DE and IS3N.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EL40.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EL40.DE
IS3N.DE
EL40.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (EL40.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EL40.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.49 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 4.42 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | 16.00 | -9.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EL40.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.69 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.53 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.55 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.44 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
EL40.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EL40.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.65%, roughly equal to the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL40.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EL40.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.65% | -35.06% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.53% | -10.52% | -6.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.17% | -19.17% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | -22.01% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.59% | -32.51% | +0.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -2.49% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.60% | -9.30% | -2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.82% | 2.91% | +3.91% |
Volatility
EL40.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (EL40.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) at 7.16%. This indicates that EL40.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EL40.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | 7.16% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.83% | 14.69% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.69% | 17.32% | +9.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 16.19% | +4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 18.04% | +2.40% |
EL40.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EL40.DE has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
EL40.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EL40.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EL40.DE Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, EL40.DE and IS3N.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for EL40.DE.
EL40.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). They also come from different issuers: Deka Investment GmbH and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for EL40.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
Find the right allocation for EL40.DE and IS3N.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer