EL vs. K
EL (The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.) and K (Kellogg Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — EL in Household & Personal Products, K in Packaged Foods. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EL vs. K - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EL
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- -18.61%
- 6M
- -17.07%
- 1Y
- 25.45%
- 3Y*
- -20.26%
- 5Y*
- -21.07%
- 10Y*
- 0.50%
K
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EL vs. K - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EL The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. | -18.61% | 42.13% | -47.59% | -40.13% | -32.31% | 40.03% | 29.77% | 60.34% | 3.38% | 68.68% |
K Kellogg Company | 0.00% | 5.99% | 49.75% | -7.44% | 14.35% | 7.44% | -6.78% | 26.08% | -13.32% | -4.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between EL and K is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 1995 | 0.25 |
The correlation between EL and K shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (5 years) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EL:
$30.93B
K:
$29.20B
EL:
-$0.68
K:
$3.65
EL:
2.07
K:
2.30
EL:
7.75
K:
6.95
EL:
$14.84B
K:
$12.67B
EL:
$11.09B
K:
$4.41B
EL:
$1.30B
K:
$2.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EL vs. K — Risk / Return Rank
EL
K
EL vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EL | K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.43 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EL | K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | — | — |
Drawdowns
EL vs. K - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EL | K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.54% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.71% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.82% | — | — |
Volatility
EL vs. K - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EL | K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.27% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.32% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.58% | — | — |
Dividends
EL vs. K - Dividend Comparison
EL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, while K has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EL The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. | 1.65% | 1.34% | 3.11% | 1.81% | 0.99% | 0.59% | 0.56% | 0.86% | 1.21% | 1.10% | 1.62% | 1.16% |
K Kellogg Company | 1.39% | 2.76% | 2.79% | 10.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% | 3.66% | 3.27% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.74% |
Financials
EL vs. K - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. and Kellogg Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EL vs. K - Profitability Comparison
EL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.84B and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.4%.
K - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.
EL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. reported an operating income of 249.00M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
K - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 452.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.
EL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. reported a net income of 89.00M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
K - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EL and K have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EL and K
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer