PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EL.PA vs. ASML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EL.PA vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme (EL.PA) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EL.PA is traded in EUR, while ASML is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ASML values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EL.PA achieves a -30.71% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 80.95% return. Over the past 10 years, EL.PA has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 7.01%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 35.83% annualized return.


EL.PA

1D
2.21%
1M
7.19%
YTD
-30.71%
6M
-33.71%
1Y
-24.19%
3Y*
5.74%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
7.01%

ASML

1D
0.00%
1M
21.65%
YTD
80.95%
6M
79.01%
1Y
143.98%
3Y*
35.30%
5Y*
24.58%
10Y*
35.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EL.PA vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EL.PA
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme
-30.71%16.39%35.23%9.30%-8.12%47.94%-5.23%25.31%-2.60%8.42%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
77.49%37.93%-1.61%35.71%-26.18%76.41%52.37%97.94%-5.56%37.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EL.PA and ASML is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

0.29

The correlation between EL.PA and ASML shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EL.PA vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EL.PA
EL.PA Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
EL.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
EL.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EL.PA vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme (EL.PA) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EL.PAASMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.48

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

8.92

-9.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.02

22.85

-23.87

EL.PA vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EL.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EL.PA and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EL.PA vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EL.PA drawdown since its inception was -47.05%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -58.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL.PA and ASML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EL.PAASMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.05%

-58.22%

+11.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.05%

-16.25%

-30.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.05%

-46.09%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.05%

-49.06%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.05%

-49.06%

+2.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.68%

0.00%

-41.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-13.92%

+4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.53%

6.33%

+17.20%

Volatility

EL.PA vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme (EL.PA) is 7.02%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 16.37%. This indicates that EL.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EL.PAASMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

16.37%

-9.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.89%

33.17%

-11.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.20%

41.70%

-11.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.57%

40.98%

-15.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.94%

37.87%

-12.93%

Dividends

EL.PA vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

EL.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than ASML's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.47%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%
EL.PA
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme
2.19%1.46%1.68%1.82%1.48%0.59%0.90%1.50%1.39%1.30%1.03%0.89%

Financials

EL.PA vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EL.PA and ASML have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EL.PA and ASML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer