PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EKVAX vs. MQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EKVAX vs. MQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Pennsylvania Tax-Free Fund (EKVAX) and BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund (MQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKVAX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than MQY's 5.08% return. Over the past 10 years, EKVAX has outperformed MQY with an annualized return of 1.77%, while MQY has yielded a comparatively lower 1.41% annualized return.


EKVAX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.30%
YTD
1.81%
6M
2.18%
1Y
6.55%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*
1.77%

MQY

1D
0.35%
1M
3.75%
YTD
5.08%
6M
5.46%
1Y
11.50%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
-2.16%
10Y*
1.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EKVAX vs. MQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EKVAX
Allspring Pennsylvania Tax-Free Fund
1.81%3.18%2.70%5.04%-9.21%2.15%3.64%6.85%1.26%5.00%
MQY
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund
5.08%4.28%-0.06%10.20%-24.23%2.67%14.65%20.89%-10.12%8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EKVAX and MQY is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994

0.28

Over the past year, EKVAX and MQY have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EKVAX vs. MQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EKVAX
EKVAX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EKVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EKVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EKVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EKVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EKVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MQY
MQY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQY Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQY Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EKVAX vs. MQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Pennsylvania Tax-Free Fund (EKVAX) and BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund (MQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EKVAXMQYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.22

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

1.42

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.29

4.41

+5.88

EKVAX vs. MQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EKVAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the MQY Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKVAX and MQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EKVAX vs. MQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKVAX drawdown since its inception was -13.30%, smaller than the maximum MQY drawdown of -41.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKVAX and MQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EKVAXMQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.30%

-41.67%

+28.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.31%

-8.13%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.39%

-17.03%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.30%

-35.44%

+22.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.30%

-35.97%

+22.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.51%

+12.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-8.29%

+6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

2.61%

-1.98%

Volatility

EKVAX vs. MQY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Pennsylvania Tax-Free Fund (EKVAX) is 0.61%, while BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund (MQY) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that EKVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EKVAXMQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

2.84%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.78%

7.50%

-5.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44%

9.44%

-7.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.57%

12.21%

-8.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.43%

13.04%

-9.61%

EKVAX vs. MQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKVAX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than MQY's 2.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

EKVAX vs. MQY - Dividend Comparison

EKVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than MQY's 6.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EKVAX
Allspring Pennsylvania Tax-Free Fund
3.18%3.18%3.03%2.70%2.55%2.38%2.70%3.33%3.32%3.13%3.11%3.41%
MQY
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund
6.04%6.16%6.04%4.46%5.87%4.93%4.21%4.00%5.24%5.67%6.10%6.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


EKVAX and MQY have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MQY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to EKVAX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKVAX dropped -13.30% vs MQY's -41.67%.

EKVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EKVAX and MQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer