EKSAX vs. EKJAX

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

EKSAX (Allspring Diversified Income Builder Fund) and EKJAX (Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - EKSAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Allspring Global Investments, while EKJAX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Allspring Global Investments. Over the past 10 years, EKSAX returned 6.25%/yr vs 16.21%/yr for EKJAX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EKSAX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for EKJAX.

Performance

EKSAX vs. EKJAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Diversified Income Builder Fund (EKSAX) and Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKSAX achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly higher than EKJAX's 5.20% return. Over the past 10 years, EKSAX has underperformed EKJAX with an annualized return of 6.25%, while EKJAX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.21% annualized return.

EKSAX

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 0.54%
• 6M: 4.37%
• YTD: 5.64%
• 1Y: 13.24%
• 3Y*: 13.17%
• 5Y*: 5.67%
• 10Y*: 6.25%

EKJAX

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 1.23%
• 6M: 3.77%
• YTD: 5.20%
• 1Y: 10.96%
• 3Y*: 22.53%
• 5Y*: 8.09%
• 10Y*: 16.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EKSAX vs. EKJAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EKSAX Allspring Diversified Income Builder Fund	5.64%	14.61%	11.50%	13.35%	-16.12%	7.96%	4.56%	16.15%	-5.26%	9.44%
EKJAX Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund	5.20%	16.28%	36.91%	33.14%	-33.88%	13.07%	39.03%	45.22%	1.13%	34.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EKSAX and EKJAX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999	0.57

Over the past year, EKSAX and EKJAX have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

EKSAX vs. EKJAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EKSAX

EKSAX Risk / Return Rank: 71
EKSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
EKSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
EKSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
EKSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
EKSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

EKJAX

EKJAX Risk / Return Rank: 9
EKJAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
EKJAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
EKJAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
EKJAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
EKJAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EKSAX vs. EKJAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Diversified Income Builder Fund (EKSAX) and Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EKSAX	EKJAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	0.50	+1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	0.80	+1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.10	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	0.54	+2.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.07	1.69	+8.38

EKSAX vs. EKJAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EKSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the EKJAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKSAX and EKJAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EKSAX vs. EKJAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKSAX drawdown since its inception was -40.54%, smaller than the maximum EKJAX drawdown of -59.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKSAX and EKJAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EKSAX	EKJAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.54%	-59.70%	+19.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.01%	-18.10%	+13.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.15%	-25.48%	+19.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.91%	-50.43%	+30.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.54%	-50.43%	+27.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-1.88%	+0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-20.50%	+15.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.30%	5.73%	-4.43%

Volatility

EKSAX vs. EKJAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Diversified Income Builder Fund (EKSAX) is 2.66%, while Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that EKSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKJAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EKSAX	EKJAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	8.02%	-5.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.60%	16.02%	-10.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.97%	19.57%	-12.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.32%	28.19%	-20.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.42%	25.47%	-18.05%

EKSAX vs. EKJAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKSAX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than EKJAX's 1.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

EKSAX vs. EKJAX - Dividend Comparison

EKSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than EKJAX's 30.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EKJAX Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund	30.81%	32.41%	20.46%	40.04%	0.00%	27.04%	12.00%	16.22%	21.24%	28.36%	11.30%	7.21%
EKSAX Allspring Diversified Income Builder Fund	4.36%	4.58%	5.42%	5.05%	3.61%	3.40%	2.96%	3.97%	8.78%	4.84%	4.35%	7.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EKSAX and EKJAX in my portfolio?

EKSAX and EKJAX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EKSAX or EKJAX?

EKJAX has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to EKSAX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKSAX dropped -40.54% vs EKJAX's -59.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EKSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.