EKHAX vs. WFMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring High Yield Bond Fund (EKHAX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX).
EKHAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 20, 1998. WFMIX is managed by Allspring Global Investments.
Performance
EKHAX vs. WFMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EKHAX vs. WFMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKHAX Allspring High Yield Bond Fund | -0.92% | 7.58% | 8.02% | 10.84% | -11.70% | 2.66% | 5.43% | 15.22% | -5.42% | 6.90% |
WFMIX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 3.16% | 6.14% | 11.95% | 9.54% | -4.65% | 28.53% | 3.27% | 40.27% | -13.12% | 11.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EKHAX achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly lower than WFMIX's 3.16% return. Over the past 10 years, EKHAX has underperformed WFMIX with an annualized return of 4.43%, while WFMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.45% annualized return.
EKHAX
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 5.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- 3.03%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
WFMIX
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -6.76%
- YTD
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 3.51%
- 1Y
- 11.50%
- 3Y*
- 10.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EKHAX vs. WFMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKHAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than WFMIX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EKHAX vs. WFMIX — Risk / Return Rank
EKHAX
WFMIX
EKHAX vs. WFMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring High Yield Bond Fund (EKHAX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EKHAX | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 0.67 | +0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 1.07 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.14 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 1.06 | +0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | 3.71 | +4.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EKHAX | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 0.67 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.46 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.56 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.45 | +0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between EKHAX and WFMIX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EKHAX vs. WFMIX - Dividend Comparison
EKHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, less than WFMIX's 10.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKHAX Allspring High Yield Bond Fund | 6.08% | 6.60% | 6.66% | 6.04% | 4.66% | 3.20% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 4.63% | 4.27% | 4.17% | 4.26% |
WFMIX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 10.90% | 11.24% | 8.00% | 5.51% | 8.71% | 9.87% | 0.66% | 7.48% | 2.74% | 4.41% | 1.44% | 4.47% |
Drawdowns
EKHAX vs. WFMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKHAX drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum WFMIX drawdown of -52.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKHAX and WFMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EKHAX | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -52.70% | +18.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.00% | -11.57% | +8.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.40% | -22.13% | +6.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.75% | -43.80% | +24.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -6.87% | +5.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -7.53% | +4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 3.30% | -2.58% |
Volatility
EKHAX vs. WFMIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring High Yield Bond Fund (EKHAX) is 1.65%, while Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that EKHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EKHAX | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.65% | 5.58% | -3.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.92% | 10.53% | -7.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 17.51% | -13.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 17.17% | -11.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.88% | 18.87% | -12.99% |