PortfoliosLab logo
EKHAX vs. FFRHX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EKHAX and FFRHX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EKHAX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring High Yield Bond Fund (EKHAX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EKHAX:

2.30

FFRHX:

1.98

Sortino Ratio

EKHAX:

3.30

FFRHX:

2.82

Omega Ratio

EKHAX:

1.58

FFRHX:

1.66

Calmar Ratio

EKHAX:

2.30

FFRHX:

1.70

Martin Ratio

EKHAX:

10.15

FFRHX:

8.23

Ulcer Index

EKHAX:

0.92%

FFRHX:

0.68%

Daily Std Dev

EKHAX:

4.24%

FFRHX:

3.22%

Max Drawdown

EKHAX:

-34.72%

FFRHX:

-22.19%

Current Drawdown

EKHAX:

-0.18%

FFRHX:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKHAX achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's 0.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EKHAX having a 4.50% annualized return and FFRHX not far ahead at 4.63%.


EKHAX

YTD

1.63%

1M

1.35%

6M

1.88%

1Y

9.68%

3Y*

7.76%

5Y*

5.34%

10Y*

4.50%

FFRHX

YTD

0.77%

1M

1.11%

6M

1.77%

1Y

6.42%

3Y*

7.98%

5Y*

7.06%

10Y*

4.63%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Allspring High Yield Bond Fund

EKHAX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKHAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EKHAX vs. FFRHX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EKHAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EKHAX is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EKHAX is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EKHAX is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EKHAX is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EKHAX is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EKHAX is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FFRHX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFRHX is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EKHAX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring High Yield Bond Fund (EKHAX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EKHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKHAX and FFRHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

EKHAX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

EKHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%, less than FFRHX's 8.03% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EKHAX
Allspring High Yield Bond Fund
7.88%9.46%8.86%5.10%3.50%3.62%4.11%4.64%4.32%4.12%4.31%4.28%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
8.03%8.33%8.25%5.06%3.27%3.85%5.17%4.75%4.05%3.94%4.25%4.00%

Drawdowns

EKHAX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKHAX drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, which is greater than FFRHX's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKHAX and FFRHX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

EKHAX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring High Yield Bond Fund (EKHAX) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.63%. This indicates that EKHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...