PortfoliosLab logo
EKHAX vs. FGRIX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EKHAX and FGRIX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EKHAX vs. FGRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring High Yield Bond Fund (EKHAX) and Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EKHAX:

2.30

FGRIX:

0.87

Sortino Ratio

EKHAX:

3.30

FGRIX:

1.18

Omega Ratio

EKHAX:

1.58

FGRIX:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

EKHAX:

2.30

FGRIX:

0.84

Martin Ratio

EKHAX:

10.15

FGRIX:

3.44

Ulcer Index

EKHAX:

0.92%

FGRIX:

4.01%

Daily Std Dev

EKHAX:

4.24%

FGRIX:

17.71%

Max Drawdown

EKHAX:

-34.72%

FGRIX:

-66.83%

Current Drawdown

EKHAX:

-0.18%

FGRIX:

-0.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKHAX achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than FGRIX's 5.01% return. Over the past 10 years, EKHAX has underperformed FGRIX with an annualized return of 4.50%, while FGRIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.51% annualized return.


EKHAX

YTD

1.63%

1M

1.35%

6M

1.88%

1Y

9.68%

3Y*

7.76%

5Y*

5.34%

10Y*

4.50%

FGRIX

YTD

5.01%

1M

6.51%

6M

0.46%

1Y

15.30%

3Y*

14.12%

5Y*

17.71%

10Y*

11.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Allspring High Yield Bond Fund

EKHAX vs. FGRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKHAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than FGRIX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EKHAX vs. FGRIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EKHAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EKHAX is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EKHAX is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EKHAX is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EKHAX is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EKHAX is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EKHAX is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FGRIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FGRIX is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FGRIX is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FGRIX is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FGRIX is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FGRIX is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FGRIX is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EKHAX vs. FGRIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring High Yield Bond Fund (EKHAX) and Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EKHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the FGRIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKHAX and FGRIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

EKHAX vs. FGRIX - Dividend Comparison

EKHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%, more than FGRIX's 6.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EKHAX
Allspring High Yield Bond Fund
7.88%9.46%8.86%5.10%3.50%3.62%4.11%4.64%4.32%4.12%4.31%4.28%
FGRIX
Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio
6.47%6.80%3.93%3.43%6.02%3.61%2.85%3.39%1.52%1.80%2.08%1.72%

Drawdowns

EKHAX vs. FGRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKHAX drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, smaller than the maximum FGRIX drawdown of -66.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKHAX and FGRIX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

EKHAX vs. FGRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring High Yield Bond Fund (EKHAX) is 1.15%, while Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that EKHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...