EKGAX vs. YFSNX
EKGAX (Allspring Special Global Small Cap Fund) and YFSNX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, EKGAX returned -0.87%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for YFSNX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EKGAX charges 1.52%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for YFSNX.
Performance
EKGAX vs. YFSNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EKGAX achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than YFSNX's 24.04% return.
EKGAX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 13.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- -0.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.57%
YFSNX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 24.04%
- 6M
- 27.19%
- 1Y
- 23.43%
- 3Y*
- 15.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
EKGAX vs. YFSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKGAX Allspring Special Global Small Cap Fund | 7.65% | 3.87% | -3.41% | 14.20% | -24.78% | 21.16% | 9.76% | 28.24% | -11.51% | 21.96% |
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N | 24.04% | 14.79% | -0.47% | 16.48% | -9.39% | 13.00% | 18.32% | 24.48% | 2.18% | 20.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between EKGAX and YFSNX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EKGAX and YFSNX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EKGAX vs. YFSNX — Risk / Return Rank
EKGAX
YFSNX
EKGAX vs. YFSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Special Global Small Cap Fund (EKGAX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EKGAX | YFSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.27 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 1.69 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.55 | 5.24 | -2.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EKGAX vs. YFSNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKGAX drawdown since its inception was -58.65%, which is greater than YFSNX's maximum drawdown of -35.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKGAX and YFSNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EKGAX | YFSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.65% | -35.14% | -23.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.86% | -14.09% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.26% | -14.29% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.15% | -25.26% | -17.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.49% | -3.19% | -16.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.91% | -4.93% | -8.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.95% | 4.50% | +0.45% |
Volatility
EKGAX vs. YFSNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring Special Global Small Cap Fund (EKGAX) is 4.28%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that EKGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EKGAX | YFSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 6.52% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.98% | 21.26% | -10.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 21.73% | -6.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 15.52% | +4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 16.29% | +2.50% |
EKGAX vs. YFSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKGAX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than YFSNX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
EKGAX vs. YFSNX - Dividend Comparison
EKGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while YFSNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKGAX Allspring Special Global Small Cap Fund | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 4.32% | 16.71% | 0.00% | 7.06% | 10.04% | 12.29% | 6.98% | 5.20% |
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.40% | 7.86% | 4.33% | 8.06% | 4.71% | 6.59% | 0.71% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EKGAX and YFSNX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YFSNX has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to EKGAX (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKGAX dropped -58.65% vs YFSNX's -35.14%.
YFSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EKGAX and YFSNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer