PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EKG vs. ROBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EKG vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKG achieves a -10.11% return, which is significantly lower than ROBT's 14.22% return.


EKG

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.98%
YTD
-10.11%
6M
-12.99%
1Y
-0.93%
3Y*
-0.66%
5Y*
10Y*

ROBT

1D
-1.73%
1M
13.18%
YTD
14.22%
6M
12.64%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EKG vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EKG
First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF
-10.11%11.89%6.53%-0.11%-19.59%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
14.22%15.16%-0.41%27.77%-23.73%

Correlation

The correlation between EKG and ROBT is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022

0.74

The correlation between EKG and ROBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

EKG vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EKG
ROBT

Healthcare

94.9%
7.4%

Technology

2.6%
57.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.4%

Energy

-

1.5%

Financial Services

-

1.6%

Industrials

-

20.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

EKG
94.9%
ROBT
7.4%

Technology

EKG
2.6%
ROBT
57.0%

Basic Materials

EKG

-

ROBT

-

Communication Services

EKG

-

ROBT
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EKG

-

ROBT
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

EKG

-

ROBT
1.4%

Energy

EKG

-

ROBT
1.5%

Financial Services

EKG

-

ROBT
1.6%

Industrials

EKG

-

ROBT
20.4%

Real Estate

EKG

-

ROBT

-

Utilities

EKG

-

ROBT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EKG vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EKG
EKG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
EKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
EKG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
EKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
EKG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBT
ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EKG vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EKGROBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.22

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

1.42

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.10

4.09

-4.19

EKG vs. ROBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EKG Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the ROBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKG and ROBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EKGROBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

1.32

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.35

-0.48

Drawdowns

EKG vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKG drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, roughly equal to the maximum ROBT drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKG and ROBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EKGROBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.82%

-44.47%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.09%

-21.66%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.49%

-27.68%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.78%

-1.73%

-19.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.66%

-15.97%

-6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.73%

7.53%

+2.20%

Volatility

EKG vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) at 6.46%. This indicates that EKG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EKGROBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.09%

6.46%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.42%

17.51%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.57%

23.32%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.07%

25.18%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.07%

25.48%

+1.59%

EKG vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EKG and ROBT have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

EKG vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither EKG nor ROBT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EKG
First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
0.00%0.00%0.68%0.23%0.35%0.06%0.17%0.42%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


EKG and ROBT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EKG has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to ROBT (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKG dropped -43.82% vs ROBT's -44.47%.

On 3-year performance, ROBT leads with 10.10% vs -0.66% for EKG. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, ROBT has been the lower-risk option at 6.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ROBT has performed better with a 10.10% return vs -0.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EKG and ROBT have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

EKG and ROBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

EKG is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while ROBT is Technology Equities. EKG tracks NASDAQ Lux Health Tech Index, while ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index.

ROBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EKG and ROBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer