EKG vs. GERM
EKG (First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF) and GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - EKG tracks the NASDAQ Lux Health Tech Index while GERM tracks the Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EKG returned -0.93% vs 0.00% for GERM. EKG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for GERM.
Performance
EKG vs. GERM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EKG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- -10.11%
- 6M
- -12.99%
- 1Y
- -0.93%
- 3Y*
- -0.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GERM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EKG vs. GERM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EKG First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF | -10.11% | 11.89% | 4.06% |
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EKG vs. GERM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EKG
GERM
Healthcare
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
EKG
GERM
Technology
EKG
GERM
-
Basic Materials
EKG
-
GERM
-
Communication Services
EKG
-
GERM
-
Consumer Cyclical
EKG
-
GERM
-
Consumer Defensive
EKG
-
GERM
-
Energy
EKG
-
GERM
-
Financial Services
EKG
-
GERM
Industrials
EKG
-
GERM
-
Real Estate
EKG
-
GERM
-
Utilities
EKG
-
GERM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EKG vs. GERM — Risk / Return Rank
EKG
GERM
EKG vs. GERM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) and Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EKG | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EKG | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | — | — |
Drawdowns
EKG vs. GERM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKG drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, which is greater than GERM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKG and GERM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EKG | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.82% | 0.00% | -43.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.09% | 0.00% | -22.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.78% | 0.00% | -20.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.66% | 0.00% | -22.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.73% | 0.00% | +9.73% |
Volatility
EKG vs. GERM - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) at 0.00%. This indicates that EKG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GERM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EKG | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 0.00% | +7.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.42% | 0.00% | +16.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.57% | 0.00% | +21.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 0.00% | +27.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 0.00% | +27.07% |
EKG vs. GERM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GERM's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
EKG vs. GERM - Dividend Comparison
Neither EKG nor GERM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EKG has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKG dropped -43.82% vs GERM's 0.00%.
On 1-year performance, GERM leads with 0.00% vs -0.93% for EKG. On fees, EKG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GERM has performed better with a 0.00% return vs -0.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EKG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for GERM.
EKG and GERM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
EKG tracks NASDAQ Lux Health Tech Index, while GERM tracks Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EKG and 0.68% for GERM.
Find the right allocation for EKG and GERM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer