PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EJUL vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EJUL vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EJUL achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 11.45% return.


EJUL

1D
-1.21%
1M
-3.19%
6M
0.04%
YTD
1.59%
1Y
8.63%
3Y*
8.75%
5Y*
2.71%
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.42%
1M
3.09%
6M
8.08%
YTD
11.45%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
21.64%
5Y*
24.30%
10Y*
12.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EJUL vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EJUL
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July
1.59%20.20%4.38%3.50%-10.92%-2.43%1.06%3.17%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
11.45%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.93%

Correlation

The correlation between EJUL and YCS is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

-0.07

The correlation between EJUL and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EJUL vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJUL
EJUL Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
EJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
EJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EJUL vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EJULYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.61

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

11.41

-2.52

EJUL vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EJUL and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EJUL vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EJUL drawdown since its inception was -21.61%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJUL and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EJULYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.61%

-49.56%

+27.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-8.30%

+4.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.36%

-23.05%

+14.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.01%

-27.32%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.58%

0.00%

-3.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.51%

-19.80%

+13.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

2.62%

-1.65%

Volatility

EJUL vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.47%. This indicates that EJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EJULYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

2.47%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.30%

11.85%

-5.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.58%

16.54%

-8.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.81%

21.09%

-10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.47%

18.70%

-7.23%

EJUL vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EJUL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

EJUL vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

Neither EJUL nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EJUL
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.64%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EJUL and YCS have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EJUL has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to YCS (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EJUL dropped -21.61% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 24.30% vs 2.71% for EJUL. On fees, EJUL is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 24.30% return vs 2.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EJUL is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

EJUL and YCS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

EJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. EJUL tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EJUL and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EJUL and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer