EJUL vs. PSCW

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

EJUL (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July) and PSCW (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. EJUL is passively managed, while PSCW is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EJUL returned 3.19%/yr vs 6.96%/yr for PSCW. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EJUL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PSCW.

Performance

EJUL vs. PSCW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EJUL achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than PSCW's 7.07% return.

EJUL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 5.18%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 13.71%
• 3Y*: 10.69%
• 5Y*: 3.19%
• 10Y*: —

PSCW

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 7.07%
• 6M: 6.91%
• 1Y: 13.09%
• 3Y*: 11.30%
• 5Y*: 6.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EJUL vs. PSCW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EJUL Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July	5.18%	20.20%	4.38%	3.50%	-10.92%	-3.72%
PSCW Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF	7.07%	6.56%	12.95%	11.44%	-5.52%	6.09%

Correlation

The correlation between EJUL and PSCW is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021	0.54

The correlation between EJUL and PSCW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EJUL vs. PSCW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJUL

EJUL Risk / Return Rank: 83
EJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
EJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
EJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 86
EJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
EJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 87

PSCW

PSCW Risk / Return Rank: 97
PSCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PSCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PSCW Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PSCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
PSCW Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EJUL vs. PSCW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EJUL	PSCW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	3.59	-1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	5.96	-2.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.79	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.62	8.78	-5.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.32	41.67	-25.34

EJUL vs. PSCW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the PSCW Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EJUL and PSCW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EJUL vs. PSCW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EJUL drawdown since its inception was -21.61%, which is greater than PSCW's maximum drawdown of -11.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJUL and PSCW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EJUL	PSCW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.61%	-11.89%	-9.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.81%	-1.50%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.36%	-11.89%	+3.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.40%	-11.89%	-9.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	-0.55%	+0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.55%	-2.16%	-4.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.84%	0.31%	+0.53%

Volatility

EJUL vs. PSCW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) is 0.69%, while Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that EJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EJUL	PSCW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.69%	1.42%	-0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.64%	2.75%	+1.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.28%	3.66%	+2.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.66%	7.66%	+3.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.40%	7.57%	+3.83%

EJUL vs. PSCW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EJUL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCW's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

EJUL vs. PSCW - Dividend Comparison

Neither EJUL nor PSCW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EJUL Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.64%
PSCW Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EJUL and PSCW in my portfolio?

EJUL and PSCW have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EJUL or PSCW?

PSCW has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to EJUL (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EJUL dropped -21.61% vs PSCW's -11.89%.

Which ETF is better, EJUL or PSCW?

On 5-year performance, PSCW leads with 6.96% vs 3.19% for EJUL. On fees, PSCW is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, EJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EJUL or PSCW?

Over the 5-year period, PSCW has performed better with a 6.96% return vs 3.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EJUL or PSCW?

PSCW is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EJUL or PSCW?

EJUL and PSCW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EJUL and PSCW?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EJUL and 0.61% for PSCW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.