EJUL vs. PJUL
EJUL (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July) and PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - EJUL tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index while PJUL tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EJUL returned 3.05%/yr vs 10.46%/yr for PJUL. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EJUL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for PJUL.
Performance
EJUL vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EJUL having a 4.79% return and PJUL slightly lower at 4.63%.
EJUL
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 6M
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 17.58%
- 3Y*
- 10.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- —
PJUL
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- 1Y
- 15.34%
- 3Y*
- 13.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- —
EJUL vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EJUL Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.79% | 20.20% | 4.38% | 3.50% | -10.92% | -2.43% | 1.06% | 3.10% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.63% | 12.78% | 13.76% | 19.87% | -2.08% | 7.20% | 7.51% | 3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between EJUL and PJUL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between EJUL and PJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
EJUL vs. PJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EJUL
PJUL
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EJUL
PJUL
Financial Services
EJUL
PJUL
Consumer Cyclical
EJUL
PJUL
Industrials
EJUL
PJUL
Communication Services
EJUL
PJUL
Basic Materials
EJUL
PJUL
Energy
EJUL
PJUL
Consumer Defensive
EJUL
PJUL
Healthcare
EJUL
PJUL
Utilities
EJUL
PJUL
Real Estate
EJUL
PJUL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EJUL vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank
EJUL
PJUL
EJUL vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EJUL | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.59 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.64 | 4.23 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.22 | 23.29 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EJUL | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 2.74 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 1.22 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.89 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
EJUL vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EJUL drawdown since its inception was -21.61%, which is greater than PJUL's maximum drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJUL and PJUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EJUL | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.61% | -18.17% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.81% | -3.64% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.36% | -10.69% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.61% | -10.69% | -10.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.10% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -1.47% | -5.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 0.66% | +0.21% |
Volatility
EJUL vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) at 0.43%. This indicates that EJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EJUL | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 0.43% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.73% | 3.88% | +0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.30% | 5.63% | +1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.66% | 8.60% | +2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.44% | 10.02% | +1.42% |
EJUL vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EJUL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PJUL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
EJUL vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison
Neither EJUL nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EJUL Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EJUL and PJUL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EJUL has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to PJUL (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EJUL dropped -21.61% vs PJUL's -18.17%.
On 5-year performance, PJUL leads with 10.46% vs 3.05% for EJUL. On fees, PJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PJUL has performed better with a 10.46% return vs 3.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJUL.
EJUL and PJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
EJUL tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EJUL and 0.79% for PJUL.
PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EJUL and PJUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer