PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EJUL vs. PJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EJUL vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EJUL having a 4.79% return and PJUL slightly lower at 4.63%.


EJUL

1D
0.16%
1M
0.58%
YTD
4.79%
6M
6.15%
1Y
17.58%
3Y*
10.38%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*

PJUL

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.12%
YTD
4.63%
6M
5.28%
1Y
15.34%
3Y*
13.94%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EJUL vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EJUL
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July
4.79%20.20%4.38%3.50%-10.92%-2.43%1.06%3.10%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
4.63%12.78%13.76%19.87%-2.08%7.20%7.51%3.87%

Correlation

The correlation between EJUL and PJUL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2019

0.59

The correlation between EJUL and PJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

EJUL vs. PJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EJUL
PJUL

Technology

37.0%
36.2%

Financial Services

19.4%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
10.1%

Industrials

7.5%
8.1%

Communication Services

6.9%
10.9%

Basic Materials

6.5%
1.8%

Energy

4.0%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
4.9%

Healthcare

2.9%
8.4%

Utilities

2.1%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.9%

Technology

EJUL
37.0%
PJUL
36.2%

Financial Services

EJUL
19.4%
PJUL
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EJUL
9.6%
PJUL
10.1%

Industrials

EJUL
7.5%
PJUL
8.1%

Communication Services

EJUL
6.9%
PJUL
10.9%

Basic Materials

EJUL
6.5%
PJUL
1.8%

Energy

EJUL
4.0%
PJUL
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

EJUL
3.0%
PJUL
4.9%

Healthcare

EJUL
2.9%
PJUL
8.4%

Utilities

EJUL
2.1%
PJUL
2.3%

Real Estate

EJUL
1.1%
PJUL
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EJUL vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJUL
EJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
EJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PJUL
PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EJUL vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EJULPJULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.59

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.64

4.23

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.22

23.29

-3.07

EJUL vs. PJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the PJUL Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EJUL and PJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EJULPJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.74

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

1.22

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.89

-0.62

Drawdowns

EJUL vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EJUL drawdown since its inception was -21.61%, which is greater than PJUL's maximum drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJUL and PJUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EJULPJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.61%

-18.17%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-3.64%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.36%

-10.69%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.61%

-10.69%

-10.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.10%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-1.47%

-5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.66%

+0.21%

Volatility

EJUL vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) at 0.43%. This indicates that EJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EJULPJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

0.43%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.73%

3.88%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.30%

5.63%

+1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.66%

8.60%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.44%

10.02%

+1.42%

EJUL vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EJUL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PJUL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

EJUL vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither EJUL nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EJUL
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.64%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


EJUL and PJUL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EJUL has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to PJUL (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EJUL dropped -21.61% vs PJUL's -18.17%.

On 5-year performance, PJUL leads with 10.46% vs 3.05% for EJUL. On fees, PJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PJUL has performed better with a 10.46% return vs 3.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJUL.

EJUL and PJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

EJUL tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EJUL and 0.79% for PJUL.

PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EJUL and PJUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer