EJUL vs. JANB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EJUL (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. EJUL is passively managed, while JANB is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EJUL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.

Performance

EJUL vs. JANB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EJUL achieves a 4.79% return, which is significantly lower than JANB's 6.28% return.

EJUL

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 4.79%
• 6M: 6.15%
• 1Y: 17.58%
• 3Y*: 10.38%
• 5Y*: 3.05%
• 10Y*: —

JANB

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 2.16%
• YTD: 6.28%
• 6M: 7.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EJUL vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EJUL Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July	4.79%	2.84%
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF	6.28%	2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EJUL and JANB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

EJUL vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJUL

EJUL Risk / Return Rank: 85
EJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 87
EJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EJUL vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EJUL	JANB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.64	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.22	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EJUL	JANB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	2.00	-1.74

Drawdowns

EJUL vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EJUL drawdown since its inception was -21.61%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJUL and JANB.

Drawdown Indicators

	EJUL	JANB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.61%	-6.52%	-15.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.04%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.61%	-1.13%	-5.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.87%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EJUL	JANB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.83%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.30%	7.39%	-0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.66%	7.39%	+3.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.44%	7.39%	+4.05%

EJUL vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EJUL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

EJUL vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison

Neither EJUL nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EJUL Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.64%
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EJUL and JANB in my portfolio?

EJUL and JANB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EJUL or JANB?

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EJUL or JANB?

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EJUL or JANB?

EJUL and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EJUL and JANB?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EJUL and 0.25% for JANB.